Working Class, NEETS, Universal Basic Income

There is a lot of rhetoric from various leftist ideology about MUH WORKING CLASS. Since when has leftist ideology ever benefited the working class and not just turned them into cannon fodder, starve them, etc. while the leaders become the bourgeois they hate? Also under the liberal/conservative/mainstream-parties tyranny, which we could call leftist, workers are still fucked over massively. I can't think of any leftist-ideology dominated society where life isn't tremendously shit for the workers.

Doesn't leftist ideology create a problem where there isn't one; creating class divisions and making people acutely aware of them by creating such a fuss about class and turning rich against poor and poor against rich and so on?

What would leftist solutions to NEETs be?

Also, do you aspire to create a nation where everyone has to work long hours and is still poor at the end of the day, or would you rather move towards something like universal basic income and the average being basically being free to read philosophy, do art, study mathematics, and enlighten the fuck out of themselves all day? A utopian society where nobody really has to work and work is largely voluntary?

Also how do you deal with biological realities of race and gender? Would leftist societies look like North Korea; racially pure and free of all the issues that comes with a multiracial society or do you just have to fuck that all up?

Is the idea of a nation compatible with leftism? Do we have to be globalists / internationalists? Do we have to meddle in the affairs of others? Do we have to erase the national identity until it becomes completely meaningless like in Canada? Does the people make the nation (regular nationalism) or the nation the people (civic nationalism)?

Lastly, how much of leftism is utopian shit that at best could only work in a small and isolated context and easily be disrupted by a single individual fucking the whole thing up, like my own ideology of anarchoprimitivism which I must admit is unenforceable and we'll never manage to reduce the world-wide population to what it was 10k years ago, get people to stop farming, stop building cities, etc.

One more question and I'm not even sure if this on the left-right political compass at all but should we do about busybodies and "make work" mentalities that try to prop up an economy? Impractical or inefficient work that could be done better or that doesn't have to be done at all or that could be automated.

Also if I favor automation and the coming of the mass NEET society does that make me an affront to leftism or a proper leftist?

My solution to most of these problems is no solutions. Shit just has to work itself out.

Other urls found in this thread:

montalk.net/notes/revolooshin
web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml
debunkingdenialism.com/2015/02/03/mailbag-fetishizing-richard-lewontin/
physanth.org/about/position-statements/biological-aspects-race/
livinganthropologically.com/anthropology/race-reconciled-debunks-race/
nuffield.ox.ac.uk/politics/papers/2005/NLetki_social capital and diversity_final.pdf
academic.oup.com/esr/article/32/1/54/2404332/Does-Ethnic-Diversity-Have-a-Negative-Effect-on
youtube.com/watch?v=dJWAZxT-Md8
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/22/6-facts-about-black-americans-for-black-history-month/
independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/exclusive-must-do-better-black-pupils-did-with-best-improvement-in-exams-9563395.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sankara
youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0
youtu.be/GEzOgpMWnVs
twitter.com/AnonBabble

sage for shitty b8

counter-sage for answers. If you don't want to discuss things with me and give me some provocative material to think over, feel free to leave my thread, and let people that want to have this discussion with me. Did you even read to the bottom of my post before responding or did you see me complaining about classism as creating a class-divide by merely creating a "class-consciousness" and get triggered?

You know, when I talk to other people and relate to them and think about them, I never ever think about how much wealth they have or what "class" they are part of. It's just not something relevant to me at all. So when someone starts agitating "against the poor" or "against the middle class" or "against the rich" it annoys me. It's such an arbitrary fucking thing. I don't want to get on any bandwagons and be like "fuck the x". I will never paint a "class" with one broad brush. One day you're rich, another day you're homeless again. It happens.

Leftist ideology marxism is divisive in a very artificial way.

As an anarchoprimitivist I deal with a more primitive, natural, biological reality and not these social constructs like class.

nice meme

Neoliberal welfare is literally designed for users to be dependent on it. The instant you start to improve your condition, the gubmint decides you don't need it anymore.

Ok I will admit, I'm not entirely against limited forms of agriculture and SMALL cities, but we need to go back to populations world-wide more like what was the case for biblical times. We absolutely do not need this unsustainable factory farming bullshit to prop up populations that nature is begging to apply corrections to. I can compromise; to a certain extent.

woops forgot pic I meant to upload

Exactly, anyone who studies theory knows this fully well and why accelerationism is so prominent around here. The internal contradictions of capitalism means it will just kill itself eventually. Trying to put band-aids on it does nothing but slow the pace at which it dies.

You can thank militant worker's movements for not having to work 14 hours a day in a coal mine for 20 cents an hour and being shot by the cops if you complain about it.


The USSR saw massive improvements in living standards over the course of the 20th century, so did Cuba. Yugoslavia had living standards comparable to the West.


This is the ultimate goal of communism, but most would agree that this won't be possible without either a new revolution in technology that would create post scarcity, or a fundamental shift in human social behaviour. I think the former is more plausible. In the mean time our goal is to create an economy where everybody exercises some level of agency, and sees to the needs of every individual while freeing them from the domination of a ruling class.


Those class divisions are already there. The entire existence of the bourgeoisie is based on parasitism, extracting wealth that it did not produce from those that produced it. Their entire purpose for existing is to take as much from society as possible while giving as little back, and to maintain its dominant position they are willing to kill thousands let millions more starve to death, and rape the earth.


Those "issues" only exist because people let their spooks get in the way of common sense. Racial tensions only exist when people believe in race. A socialist society would eliminate (or at least try to) these spooks, since imo eliminating them is a requirement for a successful revolution.


Globalism refers to the global integration of capitalist economies, it has nothing to do with socialism. Internationalism refers to the elimination of international antagonisms to promote greater class cohesion. The idea of the nation is not necessarily incompatible with communism, as long as it does not interfere with class solidarity. In practice what we would likely see is the gradual integration of various socialist countries. First as allies, then in EU style blocs, eventually merging into superstates.

Me the accelerationist master race.

What system will come out of this that transcends both capitalism and marxism like Montalk suggests will happen?

Opinions on montalk.net/notes/revolooshin ?

also whenever people bring this up the only solution that gets done is to cut welfare (like in the US with PRWORA)

web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml

debunkingdenialism.com/2015/02/03/mailbag-fetishizing-richard-lewontin/

physanth.org/about/position-statements/biological-aspects-race/

livinganthropologically.com/anthropology/race-reconciled-debunks-race/

Read pdfs attached.


nuffield.ox.ac.uk/politics/papers/2005/NLetki_social capital and diversity_final.pdf

academic.oup.com/esr/article/32/1/54/2404332/Does-Ethnic-Diversity-Have-a-Negative-Effect-on

Also you do realise that ethno states tend to have a shit load of corruption and human rights absues within their countries?

Rojava may take that up with you. Along with the Ukranian free territory and Anarchist Cataolonia. And although I'm an anarchist, I'd advise you to take a gander at Tito's Yugoslavia.

Cuba, spain, labour unions, social democracy

Latter. That and the workers control the means of production, not the boss.


Yes. Look at Tito's socialist patriotism

NEETs shall inherit the earth.

The first two lines you respond to me with I ask simply; are you sure?

I have trouble believing it was leftist-ideology that fixed those issues and not just the changing economic and technological realities.


Am I a gommunist master race then because I want a society of voluntary workers?


Society can't function without a ruling / executive class and most of the technology and infrastructure that props up this artificially large world-wide population can only exist in the first place because of that ruling class. Your solution, it seems, is to do away with the ruling class. I think however you ought to just reform that ruling class and hold them more accountable, make them more ethical, have more transparency, less corruption, etc.

Overthrowing the ruling class will just create a vacuum that will be immediately filled again.


We couldn't have a large-scale society without that parasitism going on. Now, IDK about you, but I'm quite fine with the collapse of society and a return to a more primitive way of life. However I doubt that (you) actually want that unless you're getting in my anarchogreeny bandwagon.


Pure negroes don't even have words for the future and their whole language is like a thousand words. These differences are much too great.

The other races like the Asians the differences are more subtle but still significant!

I don't think you can just call it a spook. Besides, organizing ourselves into tribes is GOOD redart, race isn't that much of a problem unless you're trying to force multiracialism on a country. The NORKs don't have a race issue. All it takes to crash your racial utopianism is one guy who refuses to ignore the obvious differences between races.

Why have nations if not to keep the races separate? I don't really see any other reasons to have nations/borders. It's a nice way to organize everything so you don't have too many issues.

Globalism to me means a lot more than just your narrow definition. Globalism is an inevitable result of the Internet, advances in travel like planes, etc. interconnecting the world; of trade; and countries intervening in the foreign affairs of other nations or dumping their populations on each other. Internationalism to me means greater activity beyond one's own borders and is opposite of le isolationist policy of largely ignoring the rest of the world and being self-contained as a nation.

Things like the right to strike or the 8-hour workday were not generously offered to the workers by the bourgeoisie. They were the result of leftist agitation.


… What? No, you can't.


We don't "create" class divisions, we simply highlight them.


The end goal of communism is to get rid of wage labor entirely.


Who the fuck would unironically support that?


What kind of "biological realities" are we talking about here? It certainly shouldn't affect how one believes people should be treated, anyway.


"Nationalism" can mean pretty much anything, from ethnic chauvinism to anti-imperialist struggle. However, we do need to go beyond the nation-state model.


Globalism, military adventurism and internationalism are not the same thing.


So-called "national identities" were state-engineered cultural homogenization processes initiated during the 19th century.


Communism is not utopian, it is materialistic. As Marx said: Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established , an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence.


Bullshit jobs need to be eliminated, that much is fairly obvious.


Why the fuck would labor-reduction schemes be an affront to leftist thought or practice? If anything, harnessing the liberating potential of technology should be one of our prime objectives right now.


[inhales] yeah dude shit just happens [vapes]

Literally leddit spacing.

There are too many memes missing from this pic. Where is my TENDIES???

It's called a line break you dumb fuck.

Fucking normalfag…. GIVE ME MY TENDIESSSSSSS!!! *throws piss bottle*

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE–

this tbh fam
OP we have a sticky for this purpose, go post there.

Oh boy time fo' sum serious mental gymnastics.

livinganthropologically.com/anthropology/race-reconciled-debunks-race/ and academic.oup.com/esr/article/32/1/54/2404332/Does-Ethnic-Diversity-Have-a-Negative-Effect-on are going to take me forever to read through. The rest at least are short.

Can you name any places in the world where the black demographic is dominant that you'd be willing to move to?

What about where Asians are the main demographic?

Why do blacks always fail no matter what conditions they receive a country and whites always prevail no matter how hard the circumstances?

I want to live as a le isolated tribe and not have to deal with other breeds/races/"social-constructs". You can reach out to me a thousand years from now if and when the other races have built nations so prosperous and beautiful that blue eyes could look on with envy. At it stands now I'd rather be homeless and destitute in any white nation, than rich in any non-white nation. Why do all the millionaire and billionaire Chinese leave the country in a mass exodus? Why do the other races overwhelmingly want to pour into white nations?

The only other races I can even respect are North Koreans and Japanese and that's because they actually want to live in their own country and keep others out…. and the Koreans… are well… a fair lot of them seem to want to escape but maybe that's just propaganda. It's probably just the traitorous riffraff that are trying to escape North Korea.

me the tabs

I hope user actually read this shit before passing it onto me and didn't just search stuff at random and throw it at me hoping it would make his case for him.


These are small scale. Anarchism and utopian societies can exist on a small-scale. They can't function beyond a certain size though. Reducing worldwide population drastically is the only way to make anarchism viable on a global scale. However I tell you, I don't give a shit to force my ideology onto others, as long as I get to ooga booga in my own area where me and muh tribe get to LARP in peace. The rest of the world can go embrace inferior paradigms then, it doesn't bother me, unless their trash and pollution ends up in my lands…. sheeeiiiiitttttt

The fact that the majority of workers are still working in 19th century conditions proves you wrong. Concessions were forced on the capitalists to bring about the current relative prosperity of workers in the west.


Depends. Do you want to create a moneyless, stateless, classless society?


The ruling class is by definition not accountable to the subject class, if they were then they wouldn't really be rulers would they? It seems like you are getting the concept of managers mixed up with the concept of rulers. Socialism doesn't preclude having an administrators, managers, executives, etc, as long as they ultimately answer to the workers and the rest of society at large. What socialism opposes is the institutionalized domination of one class at the expense of another, particularly in ways that rob the subject classes of their freedom.


Not if the institutions of proletarian democracy are already set up before the revolution.


Why not?


Wow I didn't know you were a linguist. Please tell me more about how every language in Africa is the same. You know that in Ghana, a country about a third the size of France, has 13 officially recognized languages right?

Not everything fits into a meme-infographic format designed for your effortless consumption, you drooling retard.

You wouldn't last a week in any sort of anarcho-primitivist society.

youtube.com/watch?v=dJWAZxT-Md8

Is this related?

I'm trying to find all the shit you mentioned on youtube.

Rojava is some kind of ISIS-infested Arab Spring shithole.

Catalonia doesn't seem to be anarchist but maybe I'm just finding irrelevant results?

t. Emeritus Professor of Ethnolinguistics

Nor would any of us here, heh.

What do you think of the Order of Nine Angles?

You'd be surprised how fast you can adapt if you just let that primitive mindset set in… but even so I'm a sickly autist after a decade of shitposting. I wasn't originally… but alas… heh eheheh *wheeze*

Unironically neck thyself

pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/22/6-facts-about-black-americans-for-black-history-month/

independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/exclusive-must-do-better-black-pupils-did-with-best-improvement-in-exams-9563395.html

Sure.

Botswana would be one, Madagascar would be another. I might even go to Seychelles.


WEW LAD

Look at Thomas Sankara and the achievements he accomplished.

His domestic policies were focused on preventing famine with agrarian self-sufficiency and land reform, prioritizing education with a nationwide literacy campaign, and promoting public health by vaccinating 2.5 million children against meningitis, yellow fever, and measles.[6]

Other components of his national agenda included planting over ten million trees to halt the growing desertification of the Sahel, doubling wheat production by redistributing land from feudal landlords to peasants, suspending rural poll taxes and domestic rents, and establishing an ambitious road and rail construction program to "tie the nation together".[5] On the localized level Sankara also called on every village to build a medical dispensary and had over 350 communities construct schools with their own labour. Moreover, his commitment to women's rights led him to outlaw female genital mutilation, forced marriages and polygamy, while appointing women to high governmental positions and encouraging them to work outside the home and stay in school even if pregnant.[5]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sankara

Yes.

Newsflash: You're a dumb-cunt

I don't really agree with the aliens/spiritual mumbo jumbo but the idea that humans always seek out conflict even where none exists makes sense. Studies have shown time and again that we're happier with enemies than without, it gives our lives meaning or something I guess.

The turbo-autistic neo-Nazi occultist secret club of the '80s? What of it?

Sounds to me like you're just a Holla Forumstard with a hard-on for civilizational collapse. Like a much more dumb Unabomber.

You can't be this fucking retarded.

uhhhh hmmmm

The main thing that has me stumped there is "classless".

I think an administrative/ruling/whatever class that hoards/controls most of the wealth is necessary for a society to function on a large scale.

I don't want antagonism along class lines. I want the classes to exist; but to get along.

I also want to raise the quality of life for everyone in the nation and to put the people of the nation first over foreigners (like America First, I'm not an American though, just an honorary American vid related youtube.com/watch?v=uGZqOkeYbB0 ). I want to elevate the lower class without necessarily dragging down the upper class. I want future generations to enjoy tremendous wealth, like everybody living in their own spaceship or something.

I don't have a problem with currency/money. It's efficient and makes life less of a complex hassle. It is also necessary for economies and societies of scale.

Stateless? I wish that North America could become one big country, Europe another, and so on for each continent. Then for each continent there would be a shitload of states and many different things would be left up to them. So you could have one state like California be the land of pozz, irrelevant shiting, and drug-use; and another state could be just white puritans, and another state could be for black nationalists, and so on. A lot would be left up to each state.


The only thing that sets them apart is the apathy of the people. An apathetic population is easily ruled over. A population that fucking assassinates you when you step out of line and actually pays attention to what you're doing and holds you accountable for shit can't be tyrannized.

Speaking of le tyranny; we need to arm absolutely everyone. I don't care if they're supposedly mentally ill or what, EVERYONE above a certain age must be trained to use a gun, and given one. Yes, there'd be some shoot-outs, especially when this policy is first put in place. We'd adjust though and after some dysfunctional elements effectively self-purge we'll have a society where everyone is more, dare I say it… equal, whether they are child, woman, man, or whatever. A disarmed population is a slave population.


Nobody would have the resources/money to fund large-scale projects that cost too much to build. There'd be no space-program, no really expensive infrastructure, no military complex, etc. We'd be limited to doing everything on a smaller scale and we'd lose the advantages of mass production.


Different sorts of Africans are more different from each other genetically than Africans in general are from Asians and whites. The various tribes of Africa have huge genetic distance between them.

An anarchist society will build houses, put (probably imported) solar panels on their houses, create gardens, form markets, have horse and buggies or imported cars… a of shit will have to be imported.

…but it will never have a Large Hadron Collider and probably won't have any large factories or anything else because nobody is going to be able to afford to fund that shit.

What we can do on a small scale now is a LOT and with 3D printing and various other technologies it will be feasible to do a great many more things on a small scale.

…but we'd never have computers or advanced technology if the whole world were anarchic. These things can only be made by the societies that aren't anarchic and where certain individuals or governments have billions of dollars to splurge.

Woah this nigga is operating on another level.

Maybe there's hope for Africa to become self-sustainable and to get their overpopulation issues under control and for the continent to not be a shitpile?

What is the crime like though in his nation and is this a pure negro and also why the fuck was he able to succeed where everyone else of his race failed?

>s foreign policies were centered on anti-imperialism, with his government eschewing all foreign aid, pushing for odious debt reduction, nationalizing all land and mineral wealth, and averting the power and influence of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank. His domestic policies were focused on preventing famine with agrarian self-sufficiency and land reform, prioritizing education with a nationwide literacy campaign, and promoting public health by vaccinating 2.5 million children against meningitis, yellow fever, and measles.[6]
>eschewing all foreign aid

Me the …

Thomas Sankara was assassinated by imperialist powers who infiltrated his circle m8. He's been dead for some time. It pretty much went to crap after he died.

Could it be that maybe race doesn't factor into failure?
Kill yourself you political illiterate, and give your husband Varg a handjob on the way out.

How to get the rest of Africa off of foreign aid without just making them think we're trying to genocide or trick them?

How to end the humanitarian cancer?

How to make Africa independent, autonomous, and respectable?

Why have I never ever met someone like you? All my life it's just been REEEE YOU'RE A RACIST WHITE MALE sinner and now you're the very first leftist in my whole fucking life to calmly discuss things with me, present information, and challenge my views on race? Now, this all might be premature, as I still have to take a closer look at that snout but that whole thing about a nigga rejecting foreign aid has me mind-blown.

...

It very obviously does but it's not the whole picture.

youtu.be/GEzOgpMWnVs
Maybe if you fuck off out of Africa and stop taking their resources in the name of 🍀🍀🍀helping🍀🍀🍀 them.

aka it's an ISIS-infested shithole.


What do you expect of an anarchogreeny who wants to be a LARPagan savage? heh

The best bet is to let China take over. They won't be independent or autonomous, not even respectable to be honest, but chinks will make it barely work since they need the metals.

I have 0 desire to set foot in Africa and I have never been there nor has anyone in my lineage. Whoever is causing the issues in Apefrica is not related to me! African overpopulation is a huge issue and I wish there'd be 0 foreign aid and that the natives of Africa would just run their own shit and then trade with us. Better to trade their resources with us than we give them tons of foreign aid as 🍀🍀🍀they🍀🍀🍀 steal shit and then dump africoons on us.

Uh huh, because people are just good natured like that under capitalism. Who cares about the profit motive when there are people in Africa without cellphones.

(still watching your vid you linked right now, rather transfixed at the moment…)

It very obviously doesn't. See

What? I reckon most of the people in Africa have cellphones. If you're talking about those ape-men that can say some words and are semi-sentient though…

What is your opinion on the American Negro and his failings? At least in Africa they've been "hard done by". In Liberia the African Negroes fight the American Negroes. Who would you root for in one of the Liberian civil wars?

but muh adoption studies, muh race crime statistics for America, muh affirmative action and they still fuck up

It's no mistake that those Bantu descendants ended up in the position they are.

Is it possible that there is an intentional effort to produce low-information brainwashed "leftist" drones as a kind of controlled opposition thing to prevent any real leftist thought from existing?

Sounds like you're just going to let the chinks exploit the shit out of them then leave the whole thing collapse afterwards.

Why can't niggers be more like Dubai?

afk gonna watch some shit, will be back in the thread after taking in all these leftypills

The Minnesota test was inconclusive. It didn't have a final result.


I'm less likely to be killed in madagascar, a country filled with blacks, than I am in America.

You're a fucking retard.

*South America

we should honestly make a single large infograph or pdf based off of all the anti-racism things used to counter pro-racism arguments that are very frequent here, it would save a lot of time, it could even be updated if need be.

Those are abbos though not negroes. Australoids and negroids are two completely unrelated races. Everyone knows abbos are not that dangerous.

It would certainly advance the narrative forward. Go and do that.

well I could but I don't know where all the statistics are, we had a collective of several links but I don't know where to find them, would be appreciative if anyone who does wants to post them.

And everyone knows negros are not that dangerous. Unless you urinate on their faces. There's this weird racial thing with them about urine in their faces.

You might have a point if the Bantu didn't exist. The bantu are behind practically all the genocide in Africa and are the ones killing off every other nigger tribe in Africa.

...

Problem? I don't pretend to do anything for the working class. The only reason I'm calling out others on this matter is because their ideology purports to favor the working class.

Okay, so if I find examples of Bantu people not killing others you'll shut the fuck up?

No but if you found plenty of examples of the other types of niggers committing genocide and causing trouble on the same scale as the Bantu I might rant less about Bantu and more about the nigger problem in general.

How does examples of Bantu not chimping out excuse the rest of them doing so all the time? I can find example of wild lions not attacking people, doesn't change the overall characteristics of the lion species.

The Bantu need to be held responsible for their genocide. The lands of other tribes should be left alone and the Bantu need to be forced to get their shit together as a people.

I don't think the Khoi-San for example are any happier about Bantu than I am.

this doesn't come close to dispelling the notion of biological markers for human races. while there are technically no races, hard races, there are soft racial biological markers that effect intelligence, temperament, Autism Level and dietary needs which distinguish the races. If for instance we can trace lactose tolerance by ancestral origins and skin tone by ancestral origins, along with Malarial resistence and visuo-spatial skills then there is some, not a ton, but some merit to race. The left's hiding behind a small amount of sophistry to cover up a high degree of human biodiversity. there is a reason that the right wing viscerally makes sense to a lot of people. We are all onviously unique and often biologically distinct from each other. Only hardcore dehumanizing biotech and genetic engineering could take that HBD away.

me the supreme autist from an exceedingly autistic lineage

Tell me more about autism and race. Who are the most autistic peoples and where does the autism go back to?