Ther is a moderstor on here that is banning literally anyone that is pro-pedo and is deleting all their posts. This triggered reddit sjw cannot be allowed to continue running this place into the ground. This used to be a board of freedom and open minded discussion, not spooky bigotry.
Also this issue deserves its own thread because thats the only way people will see it. The faggot mod keeps deleting all criticisms of him in the mod feedback thread.
So many rebbitors thinking that their muh free speach applies here. Until supporting liberalism is a bannable offense, they will keep doing it.
Anthony Fisher
Finest in intellectual discourse you guys, thanks for proving that anti-pedos are not just emotional retard moralfaggots.
Lucas Miller
seriously what the fuck is going on here? When did leftypol get entirely consumed by liberals?
Christian Parker
Fuck off child fucker
Bentley Green
not interesting in the slightest in having "intellectual discourse" with a kid fucker
Juan Jenkins
This guy has been sperging out about pedophilia for at least a couple days now. I say permaban the fucker
Ian Miller
daily reminder that you cant be a leftist and support opressing young people by denying them pleasure for some arbitrary moralfag reason. There is literally nothing special about sex. Stop having moralfag feels about it.
Samuel Turner
so any one who thinks pedos should be shot on the spot is a ¿moralfaggot? yeah, i have morals. go fuck yourselves
Logan Scott
samefag
Jack Kelly
first time here on leftypol
oh this so fucking ironic. You libtards just cant help from banning everybody. On reddit, in real life, on HERE
let that sink in
Christopher Sanchez
theyre not us. this is fucking reddit. idk how they became the majority. Personally, I blame ircfags.
Joseph Carter
Stop trying to fuck children
Ian Lee
Perfectly illustrative of the poverty of Stirnerite egoism and their idealist conception of the individual: kids are not just perfectly capable of understanding the consequence of romantic-sexual relations with full-grown adults, as if a child has the same capacity to calculate his own interests and understanding the realm of consequences, but the full-grown adults in the story have nothing but their "individual" desire, completely separate of everything else, to fuck kids.
Gabriel Price
...
Logan Morales
really makes my noggin go for a joggin
Henry Scott
imagine my shock when the so called "tolerant left" doesn't want to fuck children
Kevin Russell
rape should probably be frowned upon: its a clear violation of liberty. Most people wouldnt want it done to them. Merely having consensual sex with someone young though… whats the problem with that?
Michael Walker
How young?
Anthony Turner
thats cause theyre not leftists, they are liberal roleplaying fucks from reddit
Jacob Torres
...
Joseph Adams
old enough to clearly be a conscious being
Dylan Cook
wwaaahh muh sjw
Lucas James
Why'd you ban delusional pedo opinions out of all things though?
Jaxson Evans
Holla Forums please stop trying to make leftists into pedophiles we don't want you and we really don't want kid fucking scum
Ian Martin
Because it's what Democratic trolls are pushing right now in order to obscure their criminal racket.
Sebastian Ramirez
...
Ethan Sanders
Care to explain what you mean by democratic trolls and what exactly they're pushing?
I'm genuinly confused on what this is all about now. Just seems to me like petty drama over a completely non-class issue.
Aiden Kelly
Promoting child molestation or rape is totally banworthy. Kids can't consent.
Kayden Sullivan
i'm gone by the way, if you reply to this anymore i wont see it
never coming back too. peace one love
Nolan Murphy
exactly. i really think a bunch of Holla Forums idiots are desperately trying to delegitimize Holla Forums by falseflagging with all this pedo shit and claiming anyone who isn't a child fucker is a "liberal redditor"
Adrian Long
So it's about promoting child fucking and not discussing pedophilia? Really? I feel like i missed out on some recent events here. Is this related to the Milo joke?
Chase Baker
remove reddit sjw BO
new actual leftist board when?
Gavin Robinson
How is this worse than repeated race threads though?
Ryder Collins
it's not. those are just as bad and both get so many replies compared to legitimate threads
Luis Johnson
keeping ot real
Eli Ross
whee here to discuss politics, not the fact that you want to stick your dick in a kid. barring the fact the your a disgusting human being, you have been derailing threads. Not wanting you to rape children is not an sjw stance, it's a decent human being stance.
Gabriel Sanders
I think it's fine to ban someone for arguing kids can consent, and arguing pedophilic relationships are valid.
If someone says they're a pedophile and it would be wrong to act on it, I don't think that the mods need to intervene.
Unrelated age of consent discussion is OK. Meaning, debate over laws that deal with the legal meaning of adulthood, romeo and juliet laws, and things of that nature. No arguments that 13 year olds can be with 60 year olds, or that 10 year olds are able to consent, or that kind of bullshit.
Julian Rodriguez
That's a problem with the user mentality here, not the threads themself. I really don't like banning any topics. Mods should just keep them in one thread each, unless there'll be clear cut rules that the board wont have any discussions on sexuality and psychology in general or something more comprehensive and clear cut rather than disgust over an issue.
I'm sure you could get a few earnest members and maybe even an FBI agent.
Robert Ward
Sounds good, but can't we just stick to ridiculing this? It doesn't strike me as much of an outliner in shitposting that it needs that extra attention.
Blake Thompson
I think the problem with this is that kind of thing will inevitably devolve into the things you claimed were bannable.
Owen Garcia
The liberal party's deniability organs have been lavishly funded and mobilized to disrupt online communication that doesn't serve their corporate interests. Any left organization that isn't supervised and brought to heel by the Democratic Party or the neoliberal network of think tanks is fair game. It's unsurprising that the party would, in line with the traditional practices of great fiction, write what it knows.
Nailed it.
Liberal subversion must always be allowed, mmhmm.
Gavin Howard
All I'm saying is if some pedo shits up a discussion by shilling for rape, it's totally banworthy. So if someone reports them, or they get on our nerves, they'll likely get banned. It's not like we're going to dedicate our lives to hunting them down now.
So a couple wannabe kid rapists will help us purge them. Not a big deal.
Ryan Martinez
You make it sound so serious. How is anyone saying he wants to fiddle kiddies "subvertive"? It's not really a subtile thing to put out there when subverting something.
Whom now? And i thought they're just saying it to ruin the boards image or something. Is this about genuine people now? Really, i'm a bit confused on what exactly this is about.
Jaxon Reed
If they're shilling child molestation, who cares.
Nathaniel Hall
Just my curiosity about ban reasons in general and to know why this is now a thing and where it comes from as it's quite irritating to see it taken serious. Just seems like an edgy thing, like a Holla Forumsack talking about "niggers" and their Autism Level. I'd just go "no", copy paste some response and shrug it off.
Adrian Adams
Not banning topics means liberal jackasses can always find something to derail the discourse. Why should they be allowed?
Also, kill yourself for assuming that you as a liberal bootblack and future lamp post ornament get to tell me where my agenda begins and ends.
Elite actions usually have multiple functions. This one serves to impede the non-neoliberal left's attempts at discourse and discredit the neoliberals' child trafficking ring. Only liberals are scared shitless of being kicked out of the discourse they hope to co-opt.