These are the last traces of those dreamlike days…

Like clockwork.

Holla Forums is so easy to trigger.

Lemme guess:
Basic bitch libertarianism?
Special snowflake anarcho-hyphenism?
Lemme know how your unique and individualistic political ideology protects you and your peoples from being obliterated (implying you're even white).
Race is the foundation of modern politics. You either march along or get shoved out of the way.

Back to /jp/ and otachan with you

K

At least pretend to not be redditor.

Probably just some kike playing both sides, or a faggot. There are a lot of both here.

I just wish more people would openly call out the anti-white kikes that browse Holla Forums.

...

...

Authoritarians of all kinds are cancer of the purest kind. I wish Holla Forums and tumblr would hurry up and kill each other already.

...

It's not wrong though
That is basically the premise of multiculturalism

I have never even been to reddit.

I'm sorry I don't prescribe to right wing identity politics. Go back to your safe space.

>>>Holla Forums

First of all
And secondly, the USA was founded as an ethnostate for white people as exclaimed in the 1790 naturalization act.
If you're against ethno-nationalism, you can't even call yourself a real patriot.

Yes, because it's completely not pragmatic to view large swathes of people as anything other than a collective.
Funny you shit on collectivism, but you're already apart of many different collectives whether you want to admit it or not.
You're white (presumably).
A man.
You enjoy video games.
And you're a raging faggot.
All of these have identifiable features that heuristics records.

Kill yourself.

"If you disagree with me I will be violent!"
Actually, it's more akin to
Essentially fight or lay down and die.

Facism and identity politics are not innately "right-wing".
But you do apparently prescribe to the kiked left-right political paradigm designed to box you in.

...

Stop larping faggot, nobody's dying or fighting, you're just circlejerking on Holla Forums.

I'll believe it when I see it nigger.

You're walking down a dark alleyway. You see a large black man with a hoodie on.
Do you confront him and try to gauge whether or not he's a threat?
Or do you turn your ass around and walk away?
Remember; your delusional hyper-individualism doesn't allow you to use data and heuristics to judge this large black man based on his collective attributes, only him as an individual.
So what do you do?

To think, you just wanted to post RO. FYI if what's his name wants to do another run, don't pick another dead server and don't pick one that barely has content. I don't understand why it's so hard to grasp that most of our problems came from those two issues.

Do you deny white genocide?

(not the same guy)

I walk on his direction

If alt-right is supposed to be Holla Forums, then it should say "WE WUZ EVERYONE". They claim that every single civilization everywhere on Earth was originally founded by magical Aryans from Hyborea.

That's completely wrong. The goal of "multiculturalism" is to blend all races into one monorace with a monoculture manufactured by leftist (((social engineers))) and (((Hollywood))).
A nigger is more likely to rob or murder you than a gook. Fact. You are alone at night somewhere in Japan, you are likely safe. If you are alone at night somewhere in Chimpcago or Detroit and you don't have the gun of Rambo and years of combat experience, you are most likely dead. Facts.

Yes. White women wont fuck you because they smell the pathetic on you. It's not a conspiracy, you just suck.

Okay then
No lolberg here can justify the problem of the horseshoe which is as follows:
You are merely focusing on what is important to you. To a communist, a fascist and a anarcho-capitalist are the same because they're not interested in fixing the wealth disparity.
Why? It seems both bullshit to me

THIS IS YOUR BRAIN ON LEFT-LIBERTARIANISM

You hyper-individualists really are fucking suicidal. And this is why identity politics is on the rise. No one wants their nation stripped from them for the individual and their race subjugated to the individual.

BTW, congrats. You've just had your ass capped by Tyrone and he's stolen your wallet.

Second thought experiment.
Should we allow Sunni muslims to flood the US?
Remember, not all muslims will blow you up, so does your hyper-individualism prevent you from being an islamaphobe?

This thread is fucking dead now, all it takes to nuke thread is to post swastika in OP.
By the way Holla Forumstards and Holla Forumstards can you fuck off to your boards and just continue to fling shit on eachother?

Your question is stupid, are you saying if you saw a white guy in a dark alleyway you'd go and say hello?

...

They are even in East Europe now.

Fuck off Dicky

No.

Who would you deem okay to approach in a dark Alleyway? Because I can't think of anyone I would just approach in an ally way, day or night.

If you'd stop being a disingenuous retard, you'd know the question's subquestion is which is more likely?
Nigger shooting you or a white man shooting you?
If the alley is in Detroit and you see a portly black man, do you run away?

There are almost no niggers in Japan. Japan is practically racially homogenous. The foreign population is 1%. Getting raped / murdered / killed by random niggers while walking back from the bar at midnight half naked and drunk is statistically so low it generally isn't a problem for women in Japan (although there was that one case in Okinawa with the nigger ape brought their by the US army). Compare that to Sweden, where they can't even hold a concert without getting raped because of mudslimes.

Holla Forums is National Socialist. NatSoc isn't right-wing.

Your car is broke down and just right around the corner, your phone is dead. You need help. Do you ask the black man in an alley for help?

There is an important moral distinction between violating a person's rights out of prejudice and erring on the side of caution in one's own personal choices.

Nigger apes were eventually burned alive for being niggers too.

But what happens if you see one on the street in Japan?

One of the main influences on NatSoc, Gobineau, the so-called "father of racism", was a right wing monarchist. He abhorred everything that came out of the French Revolution.

Why would I go down an ally to ask for help? Why not one of the various corner stores, or bars that exist in the city? Why are you forcing me to do something stupid? Is it because you are?

Oh sorry I didn't get your special snowflake label down. You might want to wear a little name tag with your proper political identity on it so I don't trigger you.

No

Funny how that doesn't work against the emotional masses
And instead ooga booga muh stats and dry facts, the guy on CNN could've just asked the host woman if she's racist by saying only white people can speak English.
instead m-m-m-muh statistic.
Try to reason with a nigger why bashing your head open doesn't promote his long-term success.

I'd take a photo and notify the local zoo?

Uhh, what's wrong are you racist?
Or more likely your islamophobia causes you to break your own rules of freedom for everyone

This is demonstrably false you fucking idiot.
The history and laws do not buy your rainbow coalition bullshit.
The 1790 naturalization act only allowed free white men of good character to immigrate. No asians. No niggers.

A majority of Americans didn't even want to enter the second world war, but their leaders did it for them at the behest of Jewish bankers.
You enjoy freedom, yeah? So why should we answer to a foreign people?

Can race not be broken down into identifiable statistics, polls and generalizations?

This is unbelievable delusional.

You couldn't be more a cuck if you tried.

SERIOUS POLITICAL DISCUSSIONS

So I correct you on misusing terms like a retard, and all you have as a retort is "le triggered"?
Fucking hell.

Is Ragnarok a good game though?

It's not because I don't want Muslim migrants that I can not pass in front of a black guy.

What do you want me to say? "oh I have seen the light, thank you. Lets go gas some kikes and lynch some niggers"

I'm sorry I haven't blindly agreed with you. Fuck off to Holla Forums and stop shitting up the board with your brain dead ideology.

National Socialism is an even worst Ideology than communism. I think like 3 or 4 countries gave it a chance and it lasted 15, 20 years tops? You are a failure, following a failed ideology, pushed by a bitter failure of a man who lost WW1.

All of those Muslims migrants are individuals. You don't want to judge them collectively, right? Unless you're a filthy racist.
Excluding Muslims from America is unAmerican! Everyone needs freedom!

nice reddit spacing in your posts there, fellow redditor. please tell me more about communism and why it's so great

The very goodest of goys!
Which ideology resulted int he death of over a 100 million people?

Not everyone, only us citizens. It's okay if they're filthy foreigners.

But why not? What's wrong with allowing more Muslim immigrants?

They're muslim, and islam is one of the three shitty semetic religions. The jew god sucks.

But that wouldn't explain their individual behaviors.
Why exclude them on the basis of religion? That's pretty collectivist.

Like I said, its okay if you aren't violating someone's rights. Foreigners aren't entitled passage into my country.

I wish i could choke the life out of you personally.
Fucking disgusting human parasite.
I'm a Jew, and i realize that Holocaust was brought upon us for a reason Going away from G*d, instead collecting paper, the amount of suffering caused by communism everywhere is immeasurable to what a reactionary movement did.
Funny how my ancestors suffered more from Communism than from Third Reich, even though I come from a family of Polish Jews

ackshully, human rights card says that everyone can go anywhere they please without oppression (^:

Kill yourself nazi faggot.

The commies had more time to kill people because it at least kind of works unlike the complete failure that is national socialism

I'm sure a fucking loser like you would like to choke someone who calls them out on being a lose. Why don't you do everyone a favor and kill yourself. You won't be missed.

No it fucking doesn't.

Kill yourself kike.

>un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
At least have enough dignity to know your rules of enslavement?

nice antisemtism (^:

Just because the un says it that doesn't make it logically or morally sound.

Communism has never been fully sustained in it's definitional state for very long. It always devolves into Jewish oligarchy.

Mind telling me which countries have applied Hitlerian National Socialism?

Everyone hates jews. Nobody in this world actually likes jews

Stop judging Jews collectively, you fucking bigot!

You're right
I judge them collectively if I need to.
>Unless you're a filthy racist.
I don't care
Don't worry, we send freedom in Muslim country and Europe take care of them!

No you filthy circle.

So you can't even abide by your own stupid fucking ideology.
It's tactical individualism.

ideologies are cancer. If you can't break your own rules you're mentally unfit for life.

The term "fence-sitter" became just as much of a buzzword meme as "Nazi".

Commies should still get the bullet though.

I never said I was individualist

No, but those are the principles Weimerica and UESR are built on.
Human rights are a means of enslavement through entitlement, it makes people lazy, complacent and eventually incapable of existing on their own

He's probably confusing natsoc with fascism, like Italy, II Polish Republic, maybe stretch to Imperial Japan as well.

Not true at all. Human rights are merely those rights which are entailed by the right to self ownership. People are entitled to their life, the wok of their own effors and talents, etc, so long as they respect the same rights in others. Anything less and humanity ould be reduced to a pack of wild anamals.

Oh look, all those cute little words that communists use when comparing all their minor differences between their failed ideology.

I can't wait for D-day and W-day to come and we purge all the nazis and communists from the world.

I think you have some fantasy belief that is the opposite of reality

Funny how Stalin started fight against widely defined "fascism" in 1935 and the practice is around and widely popular ever since with new titles like

What the un and europe decides isn't in any way actually philosophically authoritative on the matter.

It appears we misunderstood each other, as I mean human rights in the legal sense which are highest legal authority in an area of 1,707,642 sq miles, and not the philosophical sense.

...

you need to go back

Man is made in the image of God.

That's where the idea of human rights come from. We are all equal and deserve the same treatment.

No, we are not all equal when it comes to culture or genetics. That's why it's important to improve yourself and hold to conservative values, ethics and morality instead of godless socialism.

Holla Forums believes in darwinism and evolution, things that have been scientifically debunked and proven wrong years ago. Anyone with half a brain can know that evolution is a myth. newgeology.us/presentation32.html

It's hard for me to believe people like you are still out there.

People that believe in facts?

Yes, we still exist.

Oh, I suppose we have. I really don't much care about legality when deciding what's right.

ha

Using the same data, average wage at prada is a few thousand dollars PER SECOND (^:

Article 17 bans mass deportation
and Article 2 has the inherent implication than in case of war the army cannot use live ammo, only tranqualizer darts or negotiation skills.

You limp-wristed liberal faggots won't be purging anyone.

Reasonable if maybe a bit idealistic, but I can get behind that.
Go eat a dick

Why is this shit thread still up exactly?

because bump

Facts don't care about your feelings, user.

It's not my fault that creation has stood the test of time whereas evolutionism is based on frauds, hoaxes and logical fallacies.

...

According to the atheistic worldview, we're just animals and have no inherent value.

So no, human rights wouldn't work under that model.

Thats so wrong. Animals yes, but we're people, as opposed to unaware beasts. Self ownership comes from that self awareness.

But according to your beliefs, we're just blobs of chemicals reacting to our environment, a product of random chance. A monkey that crawled out of a slime pit 9 gorillion years ago.

'Human rights' and morality just become purely subjective. You can make up whatever you want, there is no real good and evil, everything is relative.

The U.S. was founded on the obvious and self-evident existence of the Christian God and that we are endowed with certain inalienable rights. The constitution was written for a moral, religious and educated people. Not for retarded godless commies or nazi larpers.

The unavoidable result of your worldview is nihilism, postmodernism and ironically cultural Marxism. The very things that plague America today and that have poisoned an entire generation of millenials.

But judaism is a false religion and so the jewish god that you christcucks worship is false. So that would invalidate the Constitution.

The Constitution, like every other Constitution/Bill of Rights before it (starting with the Magna Carta) was established on behalf of the common people to secure certain rights in society so they don't have to defend those rights through violent rebellion, or at least not to do it as often.

Rights don't exist because of some heeb deity. They exist because someone fought for them, or because leaders wanted to head off that fight in the first place.

All value is subjective by nature but facts are not. Moral systems are derived from a combination of the two, so a bit of subjectivity is unavoidable, but they aren't and can't be purely subjective. Utilitarianism declares happiness as having the highest value, while kantian moral systems claim rationality as having the highest value. Even the words of your god derived from assessments of value, so it's no less subjective. What the US was founded on and what the results of my claims are has no bearing on their correctness.

great argument, totally have me convinced.

I suggest you read C.S. Lewis' book "Mere Christianity" as he tackles the subject of morality better than any other theologian or philosopher, in layman terms no less.

Even if I do, I can't become a convert. I've already read the entire bible, and I just can't agree with what that god thinks is just.

This thread is a complete trainwreck.

If this is who's pictured, I hope you're doing well.

The difficulty being that all RO servers are dead, and most are complete garbage on top. It's true that Origins was a mistake (for god's sake they still haven't released another patch), but what killed this year's attempt was just people not caring. At all. Guild master wasn't interested in making another thread unless an arbitrary condition was fulfilled, and no one else wanted to step on his toes to keep the guild alive. Not even to switch servers, there wasn't any hope of survival.

If anyone's actually interested in playing, pick a server and make a thread. I'm sure you'll get an handful of people interested in playing. Even if it's just a return to heRO or whatever.

What's your problem exactly?

God IS just. He embodies everything that is good, righteous. He is holy (meaning perfect). We have a conscience and feel empathy, these are reflections (image) of God as He created us with the breath of life.

He puppeteers humanity against himself and then punishes them for what they do. Hardening the heart of the pharaoh, explicitly giving the devil permission to possess judas, blinding unbelievers, even with israel when he claims to be bringing countries against them, but then in all these cases he punishes the people who did a he compelled them to, as if they could still be said to have agency. So there's that, then there's also the issue of humanity being glorified kindling for his own glory.

...

Seems to me like more of a language/context barrier than anything else. The Bible was written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. There are certain nuances or way of speaking that you will miss or misunderstand if you haven't studied enough or use a lexicon.

When God "hardens" Pharaoh's heart, it is saying that pharaoh would have never let the Israelites go in the first place. God has foreknowledge, He knows pharaoh's decisions and thoughts. God is giving him exactly what he wants: a hardened heart. Satan entered Judas with permission from God in a similar matter. The wicked are left to their own desires. Reap what you sow, etc.

As for Israel, they were warned multiple times and given tons of chances. God used other nations as a tool to judge the nation of Israel when it disobeyed. The pagan nations wanted to destroy or enslave the Israelites anyhow - the difference is whether God allows it or not. He allows it by not intervening, or He brings miraculous deliverance by making the Israelites victorious in warfare.

God gave us free will. When we decide to rebel, He 'gives us over' to the spirits of darkness, He allows us our desires, with the natural consequences of death, sin and darkness as a result. Actions have consequences, and since God is a just God he condemns evil. But He is also merciful and gave us a way out of this conundrum through the Gospel, the free gift of salvation.

...

Good luck being a minority

Or you know Japan?

Just for you.

im not watching your 50 minute clip come up with your own arguments.

A bit of isolationism would do us good to force our shitty gubment to actually look inward and fix america's failing health/education system, infrastructure, enforce existing anti-trust laws, stop shoveling taxpayer money to foregn countries, and in general just the country back to us.

nigga that aint a clip, its a god damn magazine

What about condemning adam and eve for the "sin" they committed before they'd developed the conscious that eating the fruit gave them.

...

Intellectual understanding without a conscience can't direct one to the morally correct choice.

God gave them a clear commandment which they fully understood (including the consequences of disobeying).

You seem to be confused. They DID have a consciousness and conscience. The knowledge of good and evil refers to something else.
They lost their child-like innocence and bliss, hence covering up their naked bodies with fig leaves. They became became spiritually dead and started physical death as well. It was impossible to commune with a holy and eternal God in their fallen state.

I'm reporting the thread for not vidya.
: ^ )

Oh fuck off. God HARDENED his heart. As in, he did something. It doesn't say "and God noticed that they would inevitably remain in Egypt, irrespective of the terrors he visited on them" it says God actively intervened (presumably) to continue the torment. You're intentionally misinterpreting the passage to suit your opinion.

By the way, "God gave us free will" and "God has foreknowledge" is a can of worms.

...

...

N-nevermind.

NatSoc is not right wing. NatSoc and Fascism are Centrist. Gabineau was right wing. I am a day late to this party.

t. ring winger

*right winger
fucking autocorrect.

RING WRINGER