If we want the entertainment industry to be saved copyright protection needs be reduced to 20 years, or how long the cure for cancer would get patent protection.
Games from 1997 and older would be public domain right now. I don't sub to Netflix, but content licencing has fucked that platform and as well as other platforms. Movies like Titanic would be public domain right now.
If I made a game, I wouldn't want some sleazy manchild to make an Official sequel twenty years after.
The problem is that all somebody has to do is buy out the licence for a game and shit out a poor quality game before the time runs out to renew it.
Copyright needs to be overhauled to ensure quality products and companies shitting out stale products just to hold into the Copyright.
I'd prefer if copyright protection just lasts as long as the original creator is alive.
The risk then is someone killing the creator just to end the protection.
It has to be a fixed, SMALL period after first publishing.
that would mean their work is probably a franchise and at that point they has more money than they have venereal diseases which in turn means they can afford better ways to keep themselves safe : risk&reward
It wouldn't be official because they wouldn't own the rights. Nobody would.
You can go write a sequel to Dracula right now, plenty of people have, but nobody will give a shit because you're not Stoker. However, a lot of the sequels made have actually been good, and used the material from the novel to good effect. It doesn't mean that people think Castlevania is "The Official Sequel" to Dracula, but it is a good game series that would be weaker if it didn't have access to Dracula.
Spoiler that shit.
This would be great except many games nowdays are owned by a committee, not a single individual.
Also, Hideo Kojima might be the creator of metal gear, but he is not the owner.
It's just a horse, relax
Google the "Mickey Mouse Protection Act"
It's pretty well known at this point though. Next time they have to extend the terms to protect Mickey, people will probably be more mad than previous times.
FTFY
Disney is insanely rich and the US government is insanely corrupt. Who gives a shit if people get mad, it's not going to change anything. Even if Disney goes under some other rich kike will lobby the government to ensure nothing after 1923 ever enters public domain.
20 years pass…
Sure, you can keep making your stuff. But would you really want some kike to be allowed to make money off your work?
Because that's who argues for shorter or nonexistent IP rights. (((Libertarians))).
This will never happen until all jews are dead. Fix the actual problem.
If everyone is allowed to make shit based on other shit, Shlomo won't be able to market his shit as the Official sequel, but you will be able to still market your new stuff as being by the original creator, which effectively makes it the official sequel.
The difference is, in the current state, after you're dead, Shlomo takes your intellectual rights and makes profit off of stuff he had literally nothing to do with. Meanwhile, other talented people may be able to make good works building upon what you did, but they aren't allowed without paying Schlomo. And you may say that they should just be more creative and not use the property you created, but there are many good works based on pre-existing properties that are very good.
...
Copyright law damages creators much more directly than consumers.
...
get out (((you)))
Getting rid of corporate personhood would be another good thing.
Seriously, what the hell is it about that fucking picture that makes it so creepy?
this is legitimately horrifying
The trick is to get other countries to break their copyright and patent treaties with the US. If there is no international copyright then the entire concept itself is weakened immensely.
Name one single fucking time this has ever happened with any public domain work ever you fucking kike puppet. Look at all the good that's come from, for example, ID providing the source for Doom and Quake to the general public. Additionally, the actual creator of an IP rarely actually owns the fucking rights to it, they created it while working for a business, so the business likely owns the IP. For example, Ubisoft now owns the rights to HoMM and M&M because New World Computing held the rights to them and they bought them up.
Actually, oh, wow, it looks like your hypothetical situation actually did play out, except the one churning out shit to make money using a respected series and shitting on everything they made was a corporation. The only people that benefit from copyright protection are useless faggots who shift money around. Gas yourself.
Just kill the kikes who run it, pretty simple.
...
The extension of copyright and the destruction of public domain is maximum jewishness.
But what about the source code? Without source code, the game won't become truly public domain. It's too easy to say "i lost it lol".
Yeah, because (((corporations))) buying every title, rerelasing them in "HD", milking them for decades, then killing the whole series with a shitty mobile game is preferable. If you are an indie dev, 20 or 30 years should be way more than enough to make a fortune and three sequels if you wish, provided your game is not complete horseshit. Copyrights only help (((corporations))), because they leech of other's work.
It's not about getting rich it's about making sure no libertarian kike can make a single penny off your work.
But you're ensuring that generations of jewish lawyers will make money off your work instead.
I thought that this was legit and I only figured out it was an edit after searching for it. Bravo.