Who else ready to get lit tomorrow?

Some of you guys are alright.
Don't go to the Trump's inauguration tomorrow.

Some of you guys are alright. Don't go to the USA for the next eight years.

LARPers exist in every proletarian as a leavening agent. Truly the eternal self-blight of the workers movement.

COINTEL.

no u

Typical leftcom.

Cuck.
While we're at it, why don't you throw oily paint at the riot police during protests? Having to wipe down their visors would surely rustle them.

I'd rather read than build barricades against those who administer the bomb, denk yu very much.

No kkk no fascist Drumpf no gendered toilets in the USA.

Fuck off ya faggot and do something in your community, not the easy low hanging adrenaline chasing antifa faggotry.

No I would rather wait until Trump fucks shit up and that causes people to finally be pissed enough to start revolting. All this will do is make people think that Trump is right and we are wrong.

Jesus christ leftcoms are even insufferable with their fucking memes

Pic related is fixed

I do plenty for my community.

No you don't. You should go on the million woman march with the rest of the cunts

Why not a ballista?

That would be escalation to real violence.

CIA and Anarchists Unite to stop Drumpf from dangerous good foreign policies.

But why not a ballista?

why is violence bad?

Do you want the police to fire their full fun rifles into your edgelord crowd?

I'm going with a pistol mounted on my chest as well as an angle grinder, some smoke gas, tear gas, and Molotov all in a backpack I'll be bringing.
I don't feel like bringing my collapsible AK is going to be necessary, as if bloody Sunday kicks again fighting tomorrow will not be when we win.

If anyone is actually going or thinking of it, don't let the fences/barricades deter you, I'll grind them open for you.
Don't fear the bikers, as I will shoot for you from within the crowd.

Anyhow, can't wait to see some redneck bikers 'lit as a candle in the 1600s.

Some tips:

If you want to fuck with trump people, throw gasoline on them, or gunpowder, they won't be allowed to go to the events and will have to bare shit leaving them.

FBI stop, pls.

...

This isn't what the revolution is supposed to be like. Please leave FBI.

DO NOT BRING A GUN UNLESS YOU WANT TO GET ARRESTED QUICKLY

Fuck off Comey

Please type directly into the Microphone, user.

...

How many Wars as he started? How many elected Governments has he overthrown?

Madoff started zero also but funnily enough I'm not excited to hand him the keys either

We need to draw everyone's attention. I think it would be for the best if we all dress up like furries.

I'd rather cops shoot into a crowd in broad daylight during the presidential inauguration than shooting random disabled (physically or mentally) people for fun any given tuesday.

That is not the point of Contention.
Defend your stance.

That wasn't me I was jumping into the fray to say that it's not really a positive. His point is dumb though I have to admit

I have a ski mask that I put netting on and plain black everything, the worst that can happen is someone in the croud that's a trump support gets upset and tries to confront me.
Other than that there's literally no risk of getting caught. Just don't let the police box you in, and if they do, thank fuck you wore gloves, give your bag to someone else and rim the netting off your ski mask to reveal your eyes.
Problem solved.

You can no longer have a revolution as it was meant to be. We must evolve to the current political atmosphere.

It's legal to bring a gun if you have a concealed permit. Worst case, again, toss the motherfucker and good thing you wore gloves.

I'd say a dozen, seeing as he's the puppeteer who puppets Hillary.

Yes, if they do that we will definitely have a revolution.
A couple dozen, or even hundred Hillary sheep and a few komrades perishing to justify the death of this police state?
I'll take it.

There are protests in dc rn

you guys are the reason why Holla Forums and Fox and /liberty/ feel like they're on the right side of the fence. unless you are going to seize the means of production, you should stay home. protest is impotent and out of control violence serves zero purpose

also nice shill post FBI we couldn't tell

Anons, do not respond to KidFucker

What do you think chimping out and joining pro-islam/refugee protests is going to accomplish?

Why not at least try?

fucking narcs

t. Holla Forumsyp in mother's basement

I'll be with you guys memetically

Trump's inauguration

Lol what's wrong with that anyways?
Besides, they're just cover for the agitators. I know many people in DC that are protesting, must "crybaby liberals," and I haven't even told them I'm going, yet alone that I came here to go.
They're a fog for us.

There's nothin' wrong wit'a'lil'babylovin' my komrade.
:3

Violence brings attention, and normalizes it to the sheep, who will (and are) join our side eventually.
It also makes another cut in this machine.

I wish I could watch the trainwreck but I have exams tomorrow.

This posting is just too good to be true.

I know it's probably US/RU/UK alphabet soup posting this, but goddamn it makes me miss my days in the black bloc.

inb4blockblocisbad

Black Block is bad

...

pic related

a nazbol reformist .. that's new

Ancoms…

What are you talking about officer. As a leftist I fully support our democratically elected president.

Not a reformist. I'm all in favor of violence but I'm in favor of revolutionary violence. Breaking bank windows which can be replaced by the bank for a few hundred dollars isn't revolutionary. It's the type of violence that's tolerated by the bourgeois because it makes socialists look like fools. Revolutionary violence can only happen within the context of a general strike or on a massive scale. Anything else is just foolish.

Amen

I didn't say I was, or I promote you going to the inaugaration and doing such things.
But around it?
It's not secure. When you have a mask, hundreds of others do, and there's thousands cluttering around you, there's no stopping you unless you stumble into the open and point a gun at police.

I'm not a pedophile anyways, I'm a nepiophile.
Babies and toddlers are 10x better than regular children.

Why is black block bad?

nazbol reformist that's also a secret syndicalist… also new

see
image

Because It is anti-state >:(

I'm a national syndicalist. I just use the NazBol flag to trigger over sensitive people.

Attacking police officers and destroying public property only serves to hurt the socialist movement. Anarchists are bourgeois puppets.

What are your thoughts on the haymarket riots?

no need to get racist

Yeah just like killing a ceo and trashing his company doesn't hurt capitalist, it hurts the left!
Just like killing the people who torture and abuse animals in the name of "science" and rescuing the animals hurts animal rights, right?
Nah m8, you're retarded.

Fuck your state.

ok, you had me there for a second, then you mentioned the fucking ALF…. might as well say you're in greenpeace too

Lmao no the state is great

Btw there is a live stream of the protests

youtube.com/watch?v=cWlwF6M0f34

Dude, killing 50 capitalists and destroying their companies doesn't hurt capitalism. Capitalism is a system, not any person or group of people.

It's better than sperging out and destroying public property. Although in the long run it wouldn't make much of a difference. Killing a single CEO wouldn't destroy the system itself. It would be like trying to take down a castle wall with a spitball. You're better of engaging in cyber warfare in order to disrupt the entire economic system through stock market manipulation. Perhaps with the end goal of crashing it. You clearly don't understand how asymmetric warfare works.

I'm not familiar enough with it to give much of an opinion to be quite honest matey.

...

Well as *the* strike that made Mayday/Labor Day a thing, I suggest you at least read the wiki for it.

Sure, I'll check it out.

What about that is hard to understand? It's a response to this where pedocom says
implying that such a thing would hurt capitalism.

I shit on anarchists sometimes but this guy gets it.

That's some quality meme son.

smh

In fact you might want to read up on historical strikes and strike theory in general considering you are a syndicalist

CRINGE

Read about it. Sounds like a failed act of (potentially) revolutionary violence.

The same reason leftists use the phrases "eat the rich", or "this machine kills fascists".

You kill them because they would kill you first if you try to dismantle their system.

Ok guys I found the fed. A nazbol flag wearing syndicalist who claims (or truly doesn't) know anything about the haymarket riots.

True syndicalist.

Killing them outside of a revolutionary context just frees up the market for other capitalists. It's not a threat to capitalism as a system unless it's part of a revolution overthrowing many more enterprises.

THE FIRE RISES

twitter.com/haileybranson/status/822263102909677572

Stream is dead :(

watch?v=OJbZ28dc2ZA

The streamer is either charging or taking a break right now

How does a revolution start without an inciting incident?

nice

new stream

BLJMzAa9qAo

What's a revolutionary context? How do you establish one? Revolution is a process, not a state. What are the steps to take prior to the use of violence? I get what you're trying to say, but I want to ask.

who's this reactionary nu-male cameraman?

THERE'S RIOT POLICE AT THE DEPLORABALL LMAO

you fucking know it

i hope tampas popping

No idea.. I'm not even listening to the audio

got any good resources on strike theory?

Rent some pitbulls

Is there something going down Monday? Someone made a post on my College Democrats' FB page about some sort of walk-out.

Also, how can we use this, etc.

Reported for beinb a literal cuck

...

Good shit comrade

It doesn't, but inciting incident -> revolution isn't the same thing as inciting incident -> nothing.

People are killing the capitalists not for being bad guys, but because they're upholding a system that's hurting the workers.

Organize people, have a plan for what to do both during the revolution and after to successfully build an economic system that's better for people's interests than capitalism. This is vague to accomodate the various theories on how to do this (including the idea that workers with no theory can be revolutionary), but the point is there needs to be intent to get rid of capitalism and a plan for how to do that and then make something else that should involve a more equitable system.

It doesn't even have to be prior necessarily. You could start a revolution with violence. The point is you need to use the violence (and the response to it) in ways that further the cause. Again, I won't be too specific because of the many theories, but also because there are so many sorts of violence and contexts for violence.

My point isn't to push any particular theory (I'm of the position that pretty much any attempt at socialism, even if it ultimately fails, is preferable to the status quo of capitalism). I just wanted to point out that there's no reason that violence against capitalists without a larger plan would accomplish anything for the left. Capitalism isn't partial to whoever is in control. As long as part of it survives, that part will fill the gap. Such is the nature of cancer. You have to get it all or it will come back.

There isn't one definitive book, mostly read about strike history. Possibly ask a few labor unions on their guidelines, I'm sure they have handbooks, but they might not be willing to give them away for obvious reasons.

here.
To add, this might be something you'd be able to get published by haymarket et al.

Come find me comrades
I'll be unmasked, the revolution needs a face ;^)

Who else is gonna be in Chicago tomorrow?

You idiot wear some sunglasses!

better yet a gasmask

...

Post your face here then, fgt.

Guys
You need to meet upw ith my group tomorrow in DC
there are 70 of us from my University
We plan on taking laxatives mid protest
We will be shitting our pants, in protest
Then shitting on the street when we have to shit
The Drumptards will not be able to avoid all the shit in the city

I guess if nothing else I can ask the local wobblie chapter

Exploitation has got to go, sentient beings should not be exploited simply to hasten our death.
A vegan world is a well-fed world.

If I kill 50 police officers in a small town people are going to be reluctant to join the police force, and thus they won't be able to enforce their laws on us as easily.
That's a win.

Death by a thousand cuts.

That is straight fucking stupid
Think of how fucking stupid you will look.

Please by all means protest but shitting all over the place makes you look like an animal, will give Trump supporters validation

If you kill 50 police officers in a small town, they will call in the national guard at the very least. Did you see what happened when people killed just a few cops recently?
It's not a win if you don't have the forces to fight back the military forces, unless you're an accelerationist and want increased police militarization in the short term so capitalism collapses faster.

I'm saying over a period of time.
If I shot one cop in my town every few months, or even few weeks, people would stop wanting to be cops here.
It's literally that simple.

The same applies everywhere, shoot cops, it'll make less people feel safe in the position and thus less doing it, and thus the authority of the state will weaken.

Why have all of my posts been deleted?

...

...

I is an ip wipe.
Same thing Happened to me in the Kink thread but, the guy who keeps talking about his Pedophilia and posting pics of kids has not had his posts removed.
Makes you think. . .

If there was a serial cop killer it would have the same results, except they'd definitely get you before you got to 50.

I basically said this. however it looks like some butthurt anarchist mod felt the need to delete all of my posts in this thread.

*It is an ip wipe

What's an IP wipe?

A mod gets rid of all the posts that have been made by any given IP within a certain time frame.

There are butthurt mods from multiple tendencies same shit has happened to me. Really makes you think about hierarchies, innit?

Apparently I made someone butthurt. The hostility against nazbols by certain members of the mod team is ridiculous. Even if you make valid points people will still shit on you for your choice of flag.

Well I agree with you when it comes to economic hierarchies.

...

Nice idpol.

What does deleting posts have to do with any of those things. Especially when said posts do not violate the rules?

You should have listened.

I do not know anything, friend. I'm just messing with you.

Sorry, it's just frustrating to feel like you're being targeted by certain members of the mod team because you happen to have a nazbol flag. I don't bring up controversial topics such as race, I rarely bring up nationalism. Most of my posts are related to socialism. Yet I get all of my posts deleted because of my flag. It's extremely frustrating.

Yeah, some of the mods are shit. I had a post deleted and got banned once immediately after having an argument with somebody in a thread with like 5 replies, with no reason given for the ban. It seemed pretty clear from context that a mod was upset that he couldn't respond to what I said and just deleted the post and banned me for a few hours.

...

Well then you want to be a martyr? Because you haven't changed your flag with this knowledge.

1917/1917

What should his flag matter if he makes valid points and does not break the rules.

he makes valid points according to himself

sorry if i'm not super convinced

Fuck off.

No, it's because I'm not willing to change my flag in order to be popular, or to lick the mods' proverbial boot.

That sucks. I'd be pretty annoyed with that.

Even if he's just plain stupid, he should still be able to post here.

It got reversed pretty fast. Not all the mods are insecure babies.

I'm not saying it does. I'm asking him why he feels persecuted.

More power to you, comrade.

I can think of one reason why he shouldn't: he's not a leftist.

Why not just post on Holla Forums?

This is the reason I've defended other people who have been shat on by the mods, even if I disagree with them. I know what it's like to be targeted by the mod team and as far as I'm concerned we should be able to maintain an open dialogue on this board without censorship. Unless this place is essentially /r/socialism.

Some of them are cool. There's at least one here who bans and censors because he's easily butthurt though.

Thanks comrade.

You have posts going all the way back to January 2nd. You are not the victim of an IP swipe.

I just want to know what happened to all of my posts in this thread? I know I didn't delete them.

I want to show up to the demonstration at my school in my Black Bloc gear, but knowing the student body, there's probably only going to be milquetoast "socialists", greens, and tankies.

Some other mod has been doing that. if you haven't refreshed the page, make a post with replies to the deleted posts, because I'm seeing 17 posts of yours in this thread. I've been in this thread for a while because of the pedophile poster.

You don't seem to understand how the police catch people.
No, I could kill hundreds with no issue if I wanted to.
It's really easy.

W-what's so concerning about me that would make you have to watch?
Oh gawsh I'm special :3

Fair enough. I don't blame you personally. You seem like a cool enough mod. Especially since you're being transparent. With that said, I really don't appreciate other mods deleting my posts simply because they disagree with what I have to say. It comes off as extremely juvenile. Hell, if you need a member of the mod team that's not willing to engage in such tactics, I'd be more than happy to apply although I doubt I'd be considered anyway.
With that said, thanks anyway for the response.

Can you please stop him ? I am fine with allowing the theoretically defending of pedophilia but what he is posting crosses a line.

...

I get why he's fucking gross but the kid pics he's posting aren't sexual (unless I missed something), just the association with him that makes it gross.

True. Best to just ignore him.

If you see anything wrong on those pictures I have bad news for you son.

Are you deleting his pics?
I don't see any good reason to delete his pics.

This is technically true. I'd be a hypocrite not to defend him. Now if he starts posting actual CP that's easily grounds for a ban.

I want to ban you

I want to ban him, but I haven't decided if I should or not. He seems to be an anarchist shitposter even if he is a blatant pedophile. Then again, this is a board for leftism, and not pedohilia.

If you don't cut with the pedophilia crap, I'll ban you.

pretty much this. My main argument for wanting to ban him is that I don't want newfags to associate us with pedophilia

To be precise, I don't know that any mod has done anything to you except for your word. I don't think Holla Forums needs a nazbol mod.

There'd be no reason for me to delete my own posts. Unless it's just a bug with Holla Forums itself although it doesn't make sense as to why it would only effect my posts within this thread. You can clearly see it when someone tries to respond to one of my posts here:
With that said, I didn't expect to get a mod position anyway with that said, I was just offering if you ever want a truly neutral mod.

mod positions are not mine to give.

Fair enough. It was just an offer anyway.

Funny how Holla Forums rather associates themselves with philosophical sociopathy, genocide, war, savagery and evil rather than with people who like to hug toddlers.

you should ban all the pedos and anyone who makes blatant autism level bait threads or "hurr durr gommunism hasn't been tried yet rite guyz lel"

When it comes to bait threads like that you're better off educating people instead of just banning them. All it does is give them validation and a screenshot to post on Holla Forums to call Holla Forums and echo chamber. With that said, pedo's are scum although they shouldn't be banned unless they post CP.

Pravda

Bruh we're on an imageboard.

Your views of leftism apply to rightism and your views of pedophiles apply to normal people. You're in upside-down land buddy.

I'm aware of Pravda although what does it have to do with this particular topic?

...

Fascists pls go anytime

What's so gross about having a love for little cuties?
Seriously, what's your problem m8.
Dividing the footsoldiers up I see. Disgraceful.

Can one not express their interests, use photos of people from that interest to convey a message, or otherwise speak of things not directly related to the thread's topic if confronted about it?

You're essentially saying "hey, I know you are a nazi, but I don't want that stuff here, cut it out and don't talk about it or I'll ban you."
What the fuck? At least define what you don't want.

...

Sectarian pls go. You are worse than a nazbol tbh.

youtube.com/watch?v=7liYfhRgXGk

Pravda is Russian for Truth. I was agreeing with your post.

...

Ah I see, thanks. I thought you were referring to the Russian newspaper in the literal sense.

NazBols literally only want whites as they're ally. Their ideology is inherently sectarian.

*their

Being fond of children isn't the same as being sexually attracted to children or wanting to have a romantic relationship with children. Most people are fond of children, so it's pretty obvious that's not what you mean by "babylover".

I don't bring up race here because there's no point in it. Not to mention, my views on race aren't as black and white (no pun intended) as you might assume.

If non-white people in the revolution is a problem for nazbols, then at that point they're free not to stand in solidarity with the rest of us. We're not in a revolution, though. We're on an imageboard for discussing politics. It benefits from diversity of opinion.

Have you BEEN to the WEST before, even for a fucking day?
People are not fond of children. Almost everyone below the age of 25 hates them, minus a few women, and a few more pedophiles.
Above that people usually see them as a burden, although have an obligation to them, while relishing in moments of joy when they have very little time with their child and finally see them again.
Don't let the fake bullshit of an average wageslave trick you into thinking they aren't miserable, stressed, or hating their life. I babysit for multiple families, they are definitely DEFINITELY DEFINITELY not fond of their children.

It kind of is though, as a romantic relationship with a child is essentially nothing more than a parental style relationship (maybe with extra cuddles) and both parties being treated as equals.
Being sexually attracted to them, well, that's a form of fondness, but regardless you're assuming I am sexually attracted to children.
I'm more so fond of them that I'd be waaaay open to making them happy, and thus I'd love to have sex with them, as kids love sex.

Nice job removing all my perfectly relevant posts with perfectly legal and non-offensive imagery in 8ch.net/leftypol/res/1249930.html you literal fucking fascist.

God damn no wonder Holla Forums died, even you, leftypol, has fascist mods.

This is fucking disturbing.

You must not be very familiar with who I am then, guess all the oldfolks really have left 8ch for good.
I live with my cousins who have two toddlers, 3(girl) and 4(boy), the 3 year old I consider my little girl friend and then I also babysit for a few other families, totaling up 4 other girls now and two other boys.

I've babysat the qt I consider my lgf since she was like 3mo old and moved in recently so now I don't have to pay rent, get cuddles 100% every day, and I get to save $1000/mo minimum thanks to get disability (lol scammed), foodstamps, medicaid, and getting cash for all my babysitting.

It's only disturbing because you aren't familiar with who, what, and how pedophiles/nepiophiles are. You've been trained in a sick society to believe lies in which promote division and enable you to be controlled easier.

I never touch any cuties sexually, nor do I even think of them sexually when I'm with them. I just cuddle, play, tickle, and lounge with them.
Sorry to disappoint but I don't start licking some baby pussy when I change their diaper.

What the fuck?

No, that's not what a romantic relationship is at all. I don't think you know what either a normal romantic relationship or a parental relationship is like. The whole point of a romantic relationship is to break down social barriers and really get to know someone and become an important part of their life. The point of a parental relationship is to raise a healthy adult who can eventually separate from the relationship. Romance is about growing closer and parenting is about growing apart. They could not be more opposite.

Sexual attraction is not a form of fondness. The two often coincide, as that's normal in healthy adults, but they're not at all the same thing. Wanting to fuck something is not the same as liking it. Ask any sexually active young person about the opposite sex and they will have loads to complain about, but they put up with it because they find the sex more important.

What the fuck, no they don't. Teenagers maybe, not fucking toddlers like you're posting.

Is it time to ban this sick filth or what?

Why didn't the USSR nuke the United States

All the pics he has been posting are the same kids and I cant find the images he is using with reverse image searching . . .

Check for EXIF?

I do not know how to do that.

That combined with
Makes me think it's time for a ban. Even if the pics aren't inherently sexual, sharing them in this context constitutes pornography, since pornography by definition is intended to sexually arouse. Other pedos could be getting of on images of kids that are not public figures in any way. This is pretty similar to posting private nudes.

nonce probably got them off facebook, which strips EXIF data.

You open it up in a hex editor and if you're lucky will contain GPS cordinates of where the photo's where taken.

They're probably the kids he "babysits".

Holy shit this is warped

If you're a good parent who doesn't shove their kids away and treat them like an unwanted pet, that's exactly what it should be like.
No social barriers. No fear. No authority. No lies. No awkwardness. Just brutal honesty and mutual respect and love.

I hope you never have kids then komrade, send them over to me.
People naturally grow apart and move on when they're ready. Children when they're young need closeness, need affection, and need lots of attention and love.
Later on they will naturally part when they develop other interests and begin to grow up. They will fly free, and you'd have done your job by creating a loving compassionate caring person who's satisfied and confident in who they are.

That's a problem with them, and their partners, that's not inherent in my opinion.
If that was the case, then you shouldn't be pissing on about sexual attraction as that is not what it is to me. I have no complaints with little children, they're uniquely perfect every time (little girls that is). Sex is an extension of my love for them, and thus I desire it with them in a perfect society where they won't be shamed for it later on. It's not something I lust for and will "tolerate" them for.
I could care less about some rub'rubs and mouth on pussy interaction. It's just a shame I couldn't bond with them and make them know that joy in life when we're together.

No need to be a bigot fam, nothin' wrong wit'a'lil'toddie'lovin'

They're from instagram, I follow a couple hundred mommies so I have smiles just a pocket away.
I can link them if you want.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

because they were/are controlled by the same general groups of individuals whose interests it was in to keep both paper tigers pitted against each other officially

WEW

you and your kind will be ruthlessly purged in the revolution

but really you're just a troll who showed up before inauguration day to either spread dissent, turn off the newcomers from our RDW endorsement, create divisions or just be a fucking faggot in general

For those who don't know, child pornographers often include "before" pictures of children in CP albums that look innocent and then increase the sexual content slowly, sometimes in parallel with grooming. Some of the people who get off on this shit get off on the "destroying innocence" angle. I'm sure some pedos just get turned on by kids, but the domination angle is absolutely a component for a lot of them. It's possible that what the pedo is posting is part of a CP album. These kids don't look like professional models or anything, but the shots are very well framed. Just saying.

t. I have cop relatives who have dealt with CP cases.

based ban, thank you mods, all praise be upon you

Ok, mods. This is exactly what I was referring to here about increasing sexual content. The picture has a view down the kid's shirt.

No you fucking retard. Kids literally start as an extension of the mother's body and slowly grow separate over time. The whole point of raising a healthy adult is to teach them how to be their own person, how to develop an appropriate ego boundary. They're not ready for emotional relationships like you're describing when they're toddlers. And it's not at all a good idea for kids to form that kind of attachment to an adult caregiver, because they'd be forming their identity around that relationship.

Yes, and that's where they start out. Relationships aren't static. They're a process. You can't get closer to a kid that the kid starts out with their parents. The process should be about growing apart to a healthy distance. Romance is about growing closer and interferes with this process even assuming there's no damage done.

It's not a problem, it's a part of life, but the point was to demonstrate that fondness and sexual attraction are not the same things.

This is precisely what denial looks like.

Sorry guys, I just kind of feel the need to rebut this shit.

That makes sense, I can see how that would justify a ban.

That image is from - instagram.com/p/BNWU3Mfg1Ct/
If that was what I was banned for then why isn't it removed?

Essentially all the photos come from this IG profile.
instagram.com/p/BDJgPxHxe68/

So it is a public figure, arguably, and they're not being posted in a sexual sense, nor are sexual in any way, and thus they're in no way pornographic.

As I said before, you are the reason why the revolution won't succeed. I'll be forced to put a bullet in your head for my own protection.

Pedos could be getting aroused by some mommies photos they're pos- OH WAIT that's what I'm posting.
Stop with your bullshit fascist justifications for censoring what you don't like.

Where was I justifying sex with children?
Please quote explicitly where I said "see, that's why sex with kids is awwwright!"

They can consent though :)

You want to go in the mathedology of parenting?
Authority is not needed, it only promotes lying, deception, and misbehavior, as well as mistrust.
Love and compassion promotes respect and mutual cooperation.

You don't k-
Thanks for making me google my usual "name" tfwqtp2tlgf;3 on duck-duckgo because apparently someones now using it to distribute CP on.
Goddammit they're doing it again.

Not a troll though, anyone from pre-purge on 8ch would know me 100%.
I was the admin of the /younglove/ board.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Appreciating it, although I don't believe it will change his mind. Dude's too far down the rabbit hole. Also he got banned for that post so at least mods are based

Fascist***

Fuck off nonce.

Here, emphasis mine.

>I could care less about some rub'rubs and mouth on pussy interaction. It's just a shame I couldn't bond with them and make them know that joy in life when we're together.

I banned you for being a creepy pedophile.

That's not justifying sex with children, that's stating the facts and how I feel about it all.
Besides, you don't need to justify something that's inherently harmless and good. You're the one that always is vilifying it.

That's totally not abusive at all!

Yes, it is justifying it through the implication that sexual activity is a joyful thing to share with kids, and here you do so again by claiming it's good, i.e. beneficial. That is justification.

Alphabet Soup pretending to be Brian Peppers pls go

Obviously there's a difference between loving kids & loving kids. Fuck you, whoever you are. Not my comrade.

lol yeah let's all give the secret service exactly the info they need to suppress us. GJ, guys.

What are some good improvised distraction/disorientation devices? I already have an infographic on homemade smoke bombs, but could a flour bomb work as well?

That's not a very effective pulley. You will still have to pull with force equal to the nazi's weight.

WHY ARE ANARCHISTS PROTESTING NOT GETTING HILLARY
HAVING A PRESIDENT AT ALL IS AGAINST ANARCHY
WHY DO YOU GUYS WANT TO PROTEST NOT HAVING FUCKING HILLARY

...

It has nothing to do with HIllary faggot, anarchists would do this either way

Did this much anarchists appear in the two days for Obummer?

Anarchists protest anyway

needs more sniffing and so on

This is our opportunity to radicalize liberals. How hard is this to understand?

Because it is very bad for creating sympathy among potential allies.

Greenpeace isn't so bad, they stopped nuclear testing in the Pacific.

Was this caught on film? We need a .webm of this.

This thread made me like the right wing a bit more again.

You cant radicalize pacified trash that lives of and is utterly dependent of the state it wants to protest.

Smashies with a typical middle schooler anarchist ideology will do that.

...

anyone notice the date?

I wonder if he wasn't just a shitposter, however disturbing and convincing he was. There was a recent thing about some Antifa guy in America defending pedophilia and being friends with a convicted pedo.

oh gee, I can't even LARP. why nature!