FIFTY DOLLARS

FIFTY DOLLARS
I
F
T
Y

D
O
L
L
A
R
S

Other urls found in this thread:

konami.com/games/bomberman/r/us/en/
fineleatherjackets.net/monkeyinflation
m.youtube.com/watch?v=f98ZwgzYyig
dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm
archive.is/R98gR
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Or you know, just pirate Super Bomberman 4 or Bomberman 64 2 for free.

It's almost as if I think that this price is outrageous, or something!

I've given up on nintendo a long time ago. This is just some nip parading some corpses around saying they can raise the dead.

No

...

Games used to be upwards of 80 dollars back in the day. 50 is literally nothing unless you are a poor black faggot who literally cannot lift his finger to fund his hobby.

Besides nintendo needs the money if they want to continue making incredible games so don't jew out on the last bastion of good game devs out there.

Why is there literally no porn of this game yet?

How and why did Tyrone even become a nigger name?
The word comes from Ireland, but it's not commonly used a given name there, it's a county in the north.

There's tons of Bomberman porn already on Pixiv, user.
A lot of it is gay

D O A

S-shut up, the Switch has the best lineup of games

what are you talking about? I only see the same shit that's on r34. No porn of super bomberman r, let alone the bomber-sisters.

The hat is missing the eyes.

I meant Bomberman porn in general, not the sisters.
You only see the same porn that's on r34? What tags are you searching by on Pixiv?

DON'T YOU DARE TALK TO ME OR MY SYSTEM'S GAME EVER AGAIN!

how much money should the fucking game cost, oh great and all knowing?

"bomberman"? I don't know fapanese, what am I suppose to type?

Less than that.

Go Go Exploding Bomb-Head Guy!!

It would be great if the hat was crying uncontrollably too

ボンバーマン
If you want to include the posts only tagged with Bomberman then write
Most Japs on Pixiv only tag in Japanese, you've probably been missing a lot of posts.

how much?

...

Fifty bucks.

This IS Super Bomberman R, bucko.

I'm saying that it's no 50 dollar game.

i'm asking how much money you think it should cost, less is not an answer.

20 at most digital, 30 cartridge.

less than the cost of a 3ds game? What kind of company would be retarded enough to sell their games at a loss per cartridge?

Konami?

still getting the same shit

But it's our fault guys, nintendo is just a poor company trying to just make it~!

I think Pixiv automatically adds the Japanese tag for certain English tags, so it probably added the Jap one already.
You could always check Tumblr

Do you know where is the best place to preorder?

Can't really blame Nintendo for this one, it's a case of Konami being Konami. And you can bet your ass that the "in-game currency" will be purchasable with real money shortly after launch pending "player demand". When you factor in Reggie's comments about opening up games for monetisation to better lure in third party devs it's practically guaranteed.
It should have been a premium $20 eshop title, with a $30 physical version later. Nothing more.

Oh boy, now we are getting to the starfox zero phase where they blame the devs rather than the ceos calling the shots!

the physical production costs of new cartridges for a new system is higher than on an established one. That's why 3ds games were 40 dollars on launch and the price steadly declined, they were using established hardware in them. This isn't the same situation.

if they sold a brand new launch title game for 30 dollars they'd be losing money with every purchase and get nothing back for their investment other than less bitching from people on the internet who don't even pay for games in the first place. That's why its retarded to think it should be priced at lower than the medium its shipped on.

Yeah, because Platinum has never made a bad game before, right?

Quit being Jewish.

Then keep justifying it to yourself while nintendo keeps going down this road. You should have saved yourself a lot of typing and just called me entitled. They knew the price point of their materials, they just knew they could fleece their retarded fanbase after the amiibo experiment.

This, until we reach a post-scarcity society this will just keep happening.

"oh god 10 dollars less than the 60 dollar standard how could Nintendo do this to us!"

you sound like a fucking faggot that looks for anything to bitch about. How is 50 dollars such an unreasonable sum for a brand new game? Here's a tip, wait a few months until the games cheaper and pick it up then.

It's a bomberman game. You could find flash games better than it for free.
It's like charging 50 bucks for castle crashers.

No one likes seeing anyone do it for free, you know.

This never happened with Starfox Zero

Platinum didn't develop Starfox Zero, they only produced graphical assets.

you're defending paying a 60 dollar game you know nothing about, is most likely a downgrade of their past game from years ago, and from a company that said "fuck video games, we pachinko now". You're a fucking drone, please recognize your disability and stop acting like a corporate,boot licking degenerate now.

...

fuck paying 70€ for Zelda

Source?

/thread

konami.com/games/bomberman/r/us/en/

14 bucks digital only.

When Wii came out I picked up a ton of 5-player turbographics games like bomberman, lode runner, and Dungeon explorer for five or six bucks each, and we played the shit out of them.

They were better times. Now I barely even see my younger brothers.

It didn't happen, and the burden of proof is on you to prove it did. Not to mention it was known from day 1 that the game would Nintendo EAD developed, with Shiggy saying at E3 2014 they were looking for another studio to assist with development, which Platinum was later announced to be that studio,

Never pay more that 20 dollars for a video game. Accepting otherwise means you have no respect for money or vidya.

fineleatherjackets.net/monkeyinflation
$36.73

Not too surprising. Nintendo has a really bad habit lately of charging full retail price for indieshit and minigames.

I'm confused. Is it not a full title?

No.

It must be because it sounds like Tyrannosaurus, probably the only dinosaur that black people can name, which sounds cool and powerful. I have nothing to back that up, but you know it's gotta be the reason.

...

It's not like any new design went into bomberman.

But I guess Nintendo charges $60 for NSMB

...

I guess you could say the prices blew up.

...

Then surely the download version is only $20 right :^)

LITERALLY

Hello shills. I get it. you've being paid by Nintendo and Konami to derail any kind of criticism against these companies.

Tell that to your fucking bosses:
The Switch will fail. Hard.

One of the main reason is how expensive everything from Switch is. The console itself is kinda expensive, but everything else costs so much fucking money. Including online.

If Bomberman is setting the tone on how expensive the games will be, no one will buy it. Nobody bought the WiiU, and you'll be damn sure not enough people will buy the Switch. At least not enough to save Nintendo and not turning the Switch into Nintendo's Dreamcast.

The other one is how Nintendo is still trying to dictate their narrative. The costumers aren't having this shit anymore. No matter how many shills Nintendo pays, or how much they're trying to censor any of their critics, they don't have that power anymore. They are only losing the few fans they have.

Tell them to stop fucking with their fans. They had enough. And they will not buy your poor excuse of a portable mess.

Wow, what a great deal. Not even 59.99 like usual on day 1!

Better preorder the physical right now or else scalpers will scoop them up! Uh oh!

#BasedNintendo

HOLY SHIT!

Irish are the niggers of the UK, so it makes perfect sense.

Am I missing something here?

It's budget Bomberman without a campaign being charged for full price. The only reason anyone would buy it is for multiplayer.

Bomberman is a very simple game in most incarnations, and this incarnation will probably be as simple as it was in the SNES days (when it was still very simple for an SNES game). It's not like this is actually going to be one of the best Bomberman games. It's probably going to make New Super Mario Bros U look original and full of content.

This is agreeable, $60 would be ridiculous, but it at least seems like they're putting a lot into it. It doesn't look like it's dsiware tier. Ideally it would be $40. As it is $50 is lame, but it's not some consolewar stoking disaster.

aren't modern games like 60 dollars?

It's fucking Bomberman, a game that is 30 years old. It's not one of the 3D platforms bomberman had on Nintendo 64, just classic Bomberman. It should not be priced at 50 dollars

Even if it's mostly tedious and inconsequential, huge teams of developers and artists work on $60 games.

Someone skilled in Unity could get an online multiplayer bomberman PoC done in a day.

Why do you assume everybody who disagrees with you is a shill?

(1)

And?

An opportunity to buy a 50 dollar equivalent of a flash game?

I'm implying you are one of those shills that just used a proxy to disagree with me, because this exact tactic was already used countless times.

I don't see any of the other shills still posting, so it is a very good possibility one of those people is you

There are several browser Super Mario and Mario Kart clones, why not Bomberman my homie?

How much is the price of that online? man it must be expensive if people are complaining about it so much.

Why do you assume everybody who disagrees with you uses a proxy?

The mere fact that you will need to play for online, along with the fact that you won't get any games (only "rent" them) like the competition is bad enough, honestly.

Because a racing game requires a lot more polish to make it good. None of those clones are, gameplay wise, of the same quality of the original. not even close. A bomberman clone does not. It's a very simple game to program, especially since it will be a copy of classic bomberman.

SIXTY BONGS
I
X
T
Y

B
O
N
G
S

All me tbh.

Nintendrones really will pay for anything.

If the WiiU proved something, not anymore.

Nintendo what the fuck are you doing?

What it knows.

But internet is just so expensive across such long distances :^)

They do it for free user, for free

Fun fact: Tyrone means Owen's Land.

Not anymore, user.
And framkly.. Does it matter?

I'm pretty sure it does have a campaign/story-mode.

Post proof then.

Don't forget, it also runs at 30fps with occasional dips :^) You know, for that cinematic experience.

...

Here's the official trailer. It literally says it five seconds in: m.youtube.com/watch?v=f98ZwgzYyig

Why is this $50 game from Konami (a company that is not Nintendo) the responsibility of Nintendo?

Even though they offer less we don't know if they charge less or not, and if they charged less I'd say it's better value than the alternatives.

it's still paid online and completely full of shit.


I'd be buying Super Bomberman R day one if it was Baku Bomberman 3 in disguise


You don't even need to ask this question.

It looks ok to decent, I don't know why people are bitching about it beyond wanting a slightly cheaper price tag or wanting a bit more originality out of it.

Man I just want more Bomberman 64, it was pretty good but a fully unrealized concept.

The 3DS version looked like another 3D action one, it'd be hard to press Konami for originality, let alone 2000-era Hudson though.

Sure are a lot of people ITT desperately defending the idea of paying $50 for a basic Bomberman game with microtransactions bolted onto it.
Wonder what would happen if someone tracked them down, and it turned out they were from a marketing group hired by Nintendo? Might be interesting to see headlines like "Nintendo's Advertising Department Embraces White Supremacist Hate Speech Forums"…

I don't understand. Isn't $50 on launch usually standard fare for console games?

Hey, some people defend a 60 dollar FPS game (which is just a reskin of the past game) with micro transactions and shit or did we all forget that COD and Battlefield exist all of a sudden?


Their excuse? It's Bomberman "We don't have to shill out 50 bucks for a Bomberman game" yet it's OK for them to shill out 60 bucks + for an FPS game.

what exactly is the problem?

If it's that bad for you, just wait until the price drops.

It's been the standard since the fucking early 90's. Look at an old catalog for a new SNES or Playstation title from back in the day, you'll be amazed at how much you used to pay major retailers for games less than a gigabyte when you pay roughly the same prices now for games that are like 10 gigs.


an FPS game with probably less actual content

Because it is not okay when Nintendo does it. :^)
Because people are upset about the prices Nintendo charges for Virtual Console games and retardedly associated Konami asking for $10 less than the standard retail price to that.
$60.00 games already charges extra for cut content. I don't think that we can get more "good goyim" than Season Passes. Who am I kidding?

Oh, you mean like CoD or Battlefield? Or any modern FPS?

I'm working class and make $75,000 a year. $50 is a lot of money to me.

That's a bad price? I'd rather pay $50 for this than $60 for the usual trash that passes for acceptable at that price point nowadays.

If the game isn't free, it is always shit.

This reminds of the times I saw people blaming Nintendo for Metal Gear Solid 3 for being a low budget port on the 3DS, instead of a remake.

I mean, there are plenty things to blame Nintendo for, but this doesn't make much sense to me.

People are mad because it's fucking Bomberman. It's like charging $50 for Pac Man. Not Pac Man World or anything, but just a new edition of regular Pac Man. May well be a good game, maybe the best version of Pac Man (this won't be the best version of Bomberman), but Namco doesn't have the balls to charge $50 for such a simple game whose changes in the last 50 years make the changes in your annual Call of Duty look revolutionary. Not that Pac Man Championship Edition or whatever the newest one is isn't a better game, but it's too simple and lacking in actual content to charge $50.

I'd pay $50 for a Pac-Man World game if it's like 2.

I would definitely pay $50 for a Pac Man World game. But not a regular Pac Man game. Regular Pac Man is still good, but it's not a $50 game. It doesn't have that much content.

Also, Pac Man World was a great 3D platformer and that's my favorite genre, which happens to not exist anymore.

More like 3 bucks, any amiibo that isn't mario, link or kirby goes on clearance.

...

bombing bastards
famous for people on miiverse freaking out over the title having a swear

Not sure if it's worth full price, but wasn't almost every single Bomberman game before this released at full price? They're usually decent games with a solid story mode and endlessly replayable multiplayer mode. I don't understand how this is considered new. I get that a lot of you don't want to pay full price for this. Whatever, that's fine… You think it looks like an eShop title like that Bomberman WiiWare game or the PSN or XBLA Bomberman. But so far this looks more along the vein of Bomberman World for the PS1.

Not saying this is worth 50 bucks either, in fact since it's a non nintendo game on a nintendo console i expect to see it hit 20 bucks pretty quickly, but at this point expecting the average Holla Forums user to spend money on their hobby is laughable

FIFTY DOLLARS
A GLORIFIED ESHOP TITLE COST AS MUCH AS A AAA RELEASE
IT'S OK WHEN NINTENDO DOES IT t.Mark

poor niggers get out

you can bet this game will end up becoming expensive and rare like every other bomberman then all these faggots will complain that they have to pay 200+ for it later.

...

nah

Heh…

Yeah, no. It didn't work for Earthbound it sure as shit isn't going to work with this.

Be lucky you don't have to pay ausfailian prices. But the digital version costing the same is hitlerious.

games were also on new exciting and developing technology. a bunch of dots on the screen actually looked like amazing graphics to people.
the dollar was also worth more so it was never actually 80$ more like 40.

...

true in fact Earthbound seems even MORE expensive after the vc release.

Never heard of inflation, huh?

That's not how inflation works.

Inflation only works if you are comparing today's money to back then. the dollar was worth more back then than it does today.

earthbound isn't a 2017 nintendo switch game

Correct, the dollar was worth more so $80 then was more expensive than it is now.

but you are comparing today's money to back then, just because you had 80$ does not mean you could buy things at today's prices. your 80$ is not worth more than what the value of the dollar was back then.

Current year nintendo also removed internet access from their console so they could charge it to you as DLC, among other things, such as having your purchased digital games locked to a single console, unlike PSN/Steam which are tied to an account or GoG which is DRM free.

$1.00 in 1991 had the same buying power as $1.77 in 2016

dollartimes.com/calculators/inflation.htm


$80.00 in 1991 had the same buying power as $141.42 in 2016
Paying $80 for a game back then would be the same as paying $141.42 for a game today.

...

You're telling me that we've suffered 77% inflation since '91? What.

How much did a Big Mac cost in '91?

No, you've got that backwards. Paying 80$ back then was the same as paying $60-70 for a game.

the .77 cents is only applied to today's buying power. if you could somehow pay 1991 money today you would have double the buying power because inflation made our money worth less.

in 1940's you could pay for a bus ride, buy a hershey's bar, buy some groceries on a nickel.

Yes, it's worth less. 80 1991 dollars are worth as much as 141 2016 dollars, because 2016 dollars are worth less.

No idea about the big mac, but a regular ass cheeseburger has gone up by about a dollar since 91 according to this random news article(Source is the Consumer Price Index from the bureau of labor statistics)

archive.is/R98gR

i'm only joking about this but i read online you could buy a hamburger for a dime.

stop giving those kikes ideas.

OY VEY!!

I remember in my hometown there was a place called 25 cent hamburger stand up until the 2000's they were of questionable quality.

THE GOYIM KNOW

It needs to have better graphics than what Nintendo currently gives. It's worth 40 at most.

Judging from the picture he posted, 5 bucks at most. I probably wouldn't pay more than 50 cents for it, honestly. Who am I kidding, I wouldn't even pay that. You'd have to pay ME to play that shit.

...

And I suppose it's also Capcom's fault for selling a game they've sold before for $10 on other consoles, now for $40 on the Switch
Don't act as if Nintendo had no part in the price

Prove it or fuck off.

Prove what?
That the Street Fighter 2 game is $40 on the switch?

That Nintendo's involved

I can understand hating Nintendo for things they did but at least hate them for things they did and not things you think they did.

Street Fighter 2 has been ported many times
And the most recent ports were all around $10, but for some reason this port for the Switch is $40
It's a bit weird to be honest

The Free market will soon fix that price.

At this rate the free market will fix the Switch by crashing it in to the ground with no fucking survivors. The best game it has at launch is a fucking multi-platform port. And the second-best day one game it has involves milking pretend fucking cows and playing quick draw cowboys like a fag.

lel

Are you fucking retarded? Underage kids aren't allowed here.

Well it did fix the 3DS store prices with their shocking 10-20% discounts on years old launch titles. Those really brought the pirates back from the dark side.
lol

Bane get out. There isn't room in this thread for you, big guy.

...

At least you guys are not Brazil, the huehues had a 1000000000000000000% inflation during the 20th century.

There were many debt slaves coming from ireland along with the niggers.

64 2 is 8 players? The main thing turning me off is the whole paid online shit.

It's because niggers love giving their kids complex or uncommon names to sound fancy, and Tyrone is one of them.

I was getting it at $60, $50 is a plus for me.

I thought the best two launch day games were BOTW and Bomberman?

don't forget the paid online

Net worth of $18.4 billion
how fucking retarded are you?

What's your go-to Bomberman title, Holla Forums?

If I may, none of you understand how business works. Nintendo has the least successful of the three consoles. YES, they didn't charge for online (which attracted buyers). YES, they charged low prices for games (which attracted buyers). But clearly that wasn't enough. So now they HAVE to change to remain competitive, or face losing the console war completely. That means charging high prices to increase revenue. That means charging for online (which, of course, is silly) to increase revenue. And then they can use that revenue to better their company and console so they can have access to a broader range of games (you know, that OTHER thing you people were complaining about?).

Honestly, besides the censorship angle, Nintendo would be really stupid to listen to you people at all.

Reminder that 1-2-Switch is not bundled with the console and also just so happens to cost $50.

Custom and 4 are tied for the best ever. 64-2 and hero can have a fight for second place.

Bomberman Wars motherfuckerrr

WHERE'S MAX

Just going to leave this here.