Thoughts on Post-Keynesian economics?
Thoughts on Post-Keynesian economics?
Other urls found in this thread:
pieria.co.uk
twitter.com
Haven't read much on them, but from my limited understanding it's gay.
And so was keynes well sorta maybe more bisexual if anything
anything that is prefixed with neo or post should be post-stabbed in the ribs
What a baseless thing to say
actually its more post-baseless because I'm aware of how baseless a sentence it was. It was purposefully baseless so as to constitute overstatement to emphasise the baselessness of adding post to the phrase, 'stabbed in the ribs'
Contributing nothing to the thread lets hold it on the declarative yeah?
Can't deny it tho can you ma boi
If your going to contribute nothing of value it seems like more of a waste of your time if anything
I'm just fucking around. Sorry for derailing you're thread. I'll leave.
TRIGGERED
I agree tbqh fam
What about neo-marxism?
Neo-Conservativism
Neo-Liberalism
Post-Irony
Post-Truth
How about post/neo-evidence and testing ???
Establishing a theory out of nothing with no accountability of its application should be punishable by deconstruction.
Most people here aren't going to know what it means.
Give us a basic overview of the subject.
>>>/trash/
...
Keynes was BTFO's by MichaĆ Kalecki. that opened the post Keynesian filed for Fundamentalists, Kaleckians, Sraffians, Kaldorians, and Institutionalists
Most of it is focused effective ideal demand and heterodox macroeconomics.
I will go to the left Rothbardian economics myself tbh, it opens so much pragmatism and works great with a lot of leftcoms theory.
If you want to get a taste of it read young Rothbard to see what i mean.
>pieria.co.uk
First decent post in the thread. This is a good overview.
Sraffa's models are a completely different way from looking at the economy from what's in Keynes and don't need anybody opening some avenue for it by criticizing Keynes in some way. Institutionalism is older than Kalecki or Keynes.
Kalecki drew a lot from Keynes (the two men got along and corresponded) and came to a lot of the same conclusions independently. He *could* be described as a Post-Keynesian. He did show that certain conclusions of Keynes were wrong though.
Rebel is a retard and post-Keynesian economics a shit.