So as of late I've been engaging in a little experiment

So as of late I've been engaging in a little experiment.
The objective of which was to find ways to educate/redpill normies.
Obviously this ran into multiple issues with minimal positive results but has yielded some useful information.

We seem to have three main problems with getting the facts out there.
1: Social conformity. Normies are heavily focused on this and avoid doing things that may make them stand out in any meaningful capacity.
2: Unwillingness to explore: Generally speaking they're unwilling to dig into any matter too deeply. This makes them extremely vulnerable to disinfo provided by (((media outlets))) who will provide what they want them to know in small easily integrated chunks. Which feeds into problem 1 as these outlets are considered "reputable" or "legitimate".
3: Attention spans: Widespread sugar and caffeine addiction along with our generally more fast paced and demanding society means that attention spans are in the shitter. Holding the attention of a normie for more than a minute or two is quite the feat and something it seems TV studios and advertisers spend a fortune researching how to do.

So in the course of my experiment I found that the easiest way to get them to integrate the information I desired was to first present it in quick and small chunks that required minimal effort to comprehend. The inclusion of reasoning or further evidence was generally detrimental to getting them to comprehend it, the conclusion on its own was enough so long as they perceived that further evidence was available. Essentially the Wikipedia approach.

This got me thinking. With all the various leaks and shit that have come out in recent years we've seen people ignore clear and obvious criminal activity on the part of the ruling class along with direct contradictions in regards to events.
The reasons that it is ignored have become more clear to me along with a possible solution.

If they ignore it because it's too much effort for them to learn then we must adapt. Essentially by providing a cliffs notes of leaked material and ruling class crimes.
But just providing these isn't enough on its own, we need a platform that normies are inclined to browse or consider sufficiently trustworthy, with the current uncertainty in regards to media we have an opportunity here.
Look to the example of Snopes, before it became the hideous beast it is today it started out as a small urban legend catalogue. At the present stage I think a site that cropped up providing these short, easy to read and easy to search summaries of leaked material could do well and so long as it avoided being perceived as partisan one way or the other could be used to distribute a lot of information that would aid our overall cause.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_credit
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_exchange
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_market_fund
referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Assem-Braz/Bartering.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparkasse
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banking_in_Germany
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Funny, easily digestible meme's with minimal text and letting the viewer come to thier own conclusions about its message.
It works even better if its controversial and trggers news into giving it free exposure. Letting everyone laughs at them.

Meme's have to be based in truth.

Nice idea for a meta, OP.
We see a lot of talk about how we need to "wake up" the masses, with threads degenerating into arguements and shilling.
We need some sort of objective analysis and experimentation with techniques - what actually works, and what doesn't, in the field.
The five words being a good example. A benign statement which is so short it's more absorbed than read. Yet when the press freaks out about it, Normies feel attacked as White people, and (possibly for the first time) think of being White as an identity and not just a mean from which their "interesting and cultured" ethnic friends deviate from.
"The mantra", on the other hand, is something people have to properly read, and which calls out race in strong terms (something that will switch a normie off - truth comes a distant third behind feelgood factor and a 'credible' source). The mantra is more of a final push over the line redpill, a pasta that should circulate among ourselves. Easing normies in needs to start small and safe.

The secret to getting the message across is dank memes.

Yes our memes are a very good and simple form of this. The problem is that the memes serve primarily as a hook enticing people into learning more.
Our memes are bait.

The sort of memes shared by normalfags are pathetic in comparison and more about repetition humour than information.

The five words was a good example of disruption methodology. Inducing events that caused a disruptive event in regards to the overall methodology and narrative of (((theirs)))
It's like an otherwise smooth and coherent story in a videogame or TV show taking a sudden and completely out of place diversion. A swimsuit episode in an otherwise extremely dark and depressing war anime, it comes from nowhere and forces you out of the structure of the existing narrative.

The Chans overall have proven exceptional at this kind of tactic over the years. But it is again primarily bait designed to bring people here so they can learn.
For those who can not learn it's just uncomfortable.
We need to exploit the mechanisms used by our (((opponents))) to fill the normalfags head with the prepackaged arguments they use against us. Providing them with prepackaged arguments and points of our own.

sage

Anyways going forwards.

The next stage of my experiment is to try and replicate and expand on the minor successes I've had.
As mentioned prior I will be mostly trying to emulate the likes of Snopes and Wikipedia by providing a fairly simple and easy to access resource for normalfags and the like.

The main constraints are obviously financial (though I can soak some costs on this front), time and exposure.
As I will be pursuing this independently for now I need to prioritise the leaked documents to do in the initial release. I am somewhat hoping Holla Forums has some advice on this regard as while I'm inclined towards something current I also want to see if I can induce any disruption in the pro-Hilary narrative.
Exposure is the more difficult issue as I'm not sure how to get that in the normalfag sphere. While I could go and make jewtube videos or something I'm not sure if that would work.

...

Please continue. I'm in similar research and development efforts, however we tend to focus on people's reaction to our enemies action, rather than direct messaging.

We should disseminate rage-porn vids of our (((Opponents))) - anger bypasses all mental blocks.

Well to expand on what sort of thing works with normalfags and at least gets some response from them that isn't prepackaged.

Lets look at these two images.
The first is a saved collection of posts from this very board. Fairly recent too. Explaining why the USA invading North Korea is generally a bad move and why they want to do it anyways.
It's long, its thought out and contains a lot of reasoning.
Normalfags won't read this, if someone tried to claim it was a meme we'd laugh and say it's like something lefty/pol/ made.
If you attempted to engage them conversationally on the subject and explained all this they would barely register it, spout some prepackaged bullshit then probably move the discussion elsewhere.
It's just too much for them to think about at once.

The second image meanwhile is an electoral map of the USA showing blue districts. I forget the year, probably the last election.
It's short, simple and can be comprehended at a glance.
Essentially it's a headline. Which is what the normalfag uses as their primary means of obtaining information.

It brings us back to the three problems I expanded on in the OP.
Mainstream outlets focus on soundbites and headlines that can be integrated into the normalfags memory quickly and easily.
The normalfag is unwilling to explore a concept or matter in any depth. Typically because they don't consider it relevant.
And finally their short attention spans.

So we need to utilise the same sort of tricks as (((them))) by providing headlines and soundbites then essentially shotgunning them out there while making them easy to spread.
We can't fix the normalfag. He is what he is, but we can exploit the mechanisms that have been built into him by our (((opponents)))

The best approach I've found is to consolidate redpills into the highlights. Try doing this exercise. Name as many redpills off the top of your head in under a minute. List them like all of the redpill repositories were out of access and you can't load Holla Forums. How many could you list in under a minute?

Again, the point of this exercise is to see which redpills you hold onto the most on the fly and ones you mention without stimuli, i.e. someone mentions something and you remember another redpill. The next step of course is to catalog the redpills you would otherwise remember and to sort out redpills you have stored in your redpill archives. Since bite-size redpills are extremely effective because they represent indisputable truths that contradict jew lies, they are also the most easily meme-worthy. They're also easy to craft, as proven in the exercise I mentioned, you can find out what's the most enticing in that way or if you are a debate guy use the mental list as points you would raise if debates and list them.

Your problem here is taking the idea of the 'normie' literally. There is no normie. Just people. If you want to know how to redpill people, think about how you yourself got redpilled.
People naturally accept information which supports their existing biases, and reject that which does not. As I am now, I will be fairly accepting of anything posted here relative to how accepting of something published by the BBC, say.
This begs the question: how did your biases initially change? How might we change peoples' initial biases? It's been demonstrated that decisions are always made by emotions, and that any 'rational decision-making' occurs after the decision has been made. If you think of yourself as a rational person, all that means is your mind is good at incorporating emotionally-driven decisions into a rational world view.
So answering this question will require some honest introspection. For me, the first real shift was Muslim terrorism. That shit is fucking scary. The thought that you could be fucking dismembered just walking down the street scares people. It scares everyone. That was the first step. The second step was seeing people defend them. Fuck those people. Clearly if they're defending them then they're not on my side. Fear and betrayal were the two crucial emotions in my 'redpilling.'
After that it becomes easy to incorporate many things into this narrative of fear and betrayal. And I say this not to discredit these ideas. In fact, the reason this becomes the narrative is because it seems to me to be closer to the truth than what I previously believed. It makes a lot of sense that the Jews and leftists and the Muslims are all my enemies. They say they are and then they act like they are. But it is still a narrative into which I fit events. And I'm not a NEET virgin but like anyone I've had trouble with women and employment. Everyone has. And when I see every single employer preaching diversity and everything on TV pushing race-mixing, again I feel afraid, afraid of being disinherited, or my children being disinherited, afraid that they'll have nothing, and betrayal, I'm betrayed by all these people who do this and say it is what is best for my people and my country.

Honestly, something the Left does well is make us seem simultaneously absurd and sinister. Although they constantly accuse us of 'fearmongering,' this is something we never do. Communists to us are absurd, but not dangerous. Jews are pathetic and disgusting, but not really intimidating. These statements are false and we are lying to ourselves and everyone else if we don't say so. We need to make people afraid of communists again. We need people to afraid of Jews again, and Freemasons, and niggers, and homosexuals, and Muslims, etc. etc. We need to do a better job at fearmongering. We need your average menopausal woman to be afraid of our enemies, so that they come to us for help. We are not going to attract them by seeming 'badass.' Once everyone knows to fear our enemies and rely on us: clearly we've already won.

You should reduce your expectations and narrow the audience you are targeting.
There's only certain people that can be redpilled.
Most people are weak minded, they are followers, they will never think for themselves. They will always only do what is around them. Those people are not important.
Also remember that you only need 11% of people to be vigorously with your ideology to convince everyone else and essentially socially legislate the culture of your society.
Focus on those key people.

they are here already

archive.fo/drVHN

Many of us here are on the similar thought train. But yea, pic related.

Also, the way that I think it works…which we all experience as weird in these normies, that yuri bezmenov described, as "even if the truth stares right at the normies, they still wont accept it"

But the reason why they wont accept has something to do with the web of lies that the jews constructed for them. Which is now inside of their heads. To attack us, they found every category that had importance to our reasoning. Think of things like "threat recognition"(everyone is equal), "martial prowess" (nu males and the cuck programming, feminism etc.), sexual degeneracy, easy of abortion, and non taboo of sex…many such categories they are.

And together they completely undermine the concept of "free will" in most people who do not have additional neurons. What they have been doing, we have been undoing for several years now, or how it has been done to us.

the main trick of the matter is to try to find novel ways to attack this programmed neural net, which they cannot anticipate. Like the meme wars crap. To try to find that little part of their neural net, which the jew allowed the white man to have, so they can steal his taxes, that little part of creative job seeking, employment, problem solving, and to try to create new mental paths, without triggering the alarm bells (muh holocaust, muh evil nazi's)

While a good idea overall.
The problem you have there is that the normalfag will perceive these as just accusations or outright lies.
There is no perception of evidence. This perception of evidence seems to be key. It's how Wikipedia maintains its position for example. Barely anyone checks the citations and sources but because the normalfag thinks they are there and have been checked they choose to trust Wikipedia.

This system that has been built into them by the (((established powers))) is ripe for exploitation.
My best results always came from situations where this perception of evidence was satisfied in the subject. Even if there was no actual evidence.

Problem there is it seems we're long past the point where many can be fixed.
We have to work with who we have rather than who we want.
That being said the two efforts can go hand in hand.

That's because they are NPCs, lemmings. Most people are this, unfortunately. If this was back in the day, most of them would be heiling Hitler. They can't think for themselves, normalfags have no convictions, no real survival instinct. They're not really even alive.

Such as (You)rself? :^)

oh and another thing is: Verbal IQ is probably real, most people have terrible verbal IQ abilities. They cannot express what they believe, they do not even have the capacity to tell you about their mental neural nets. Most people will just shrug it off and just let it slide as some sort of feeling of self superiority. Thinking that their ill defined feeling is the end point, it cannot be manipulated and is just. Not realizing that it was indeed entirely fabricated.

It is quite surreal to witness this, these hoardes of retarded people who are copy pasting somekind of feeling of superiority, which was handed down to them by the jew media. I know that its fabricated, but to them it feels like its so alive. That its such a great tool and thing that they have. That their life is not meaningless and that they too can sit at the big boys table. Christ…

So many of these self absorbed retards around. I swear to god if I wasnt volkish I would wish for a total extermination of these people. Well what do you expect would come out of evolution? So many people are born, with zero uniqueness, line and line of houses plastered next to eachother. Hospitals pumping out babies in uniformity. Communities and peoples who are so alike that the art of commerce, industry and service spawned international successful businesses (like mcdonalds).

And here we are, most of us are somekind of weird proto religious fagets (without a central belief in gods), trying to find a path of sanity, when its littered with hunchbacked smartphone using drones, plastered to surveillance applications, consuming soy, and bloating up with their endless piles of tech. While the jew controls nearly every aspect of their lives. Quite a departure of medieval life isnt it?

Strictly speaking we never left the feudal era.
All that changes is the lords, their lands and their titles.

Maybe, maybe not, but it has become a lot more complicated. It is as if out brains grew larger…but at the same time we started to add more thing to life which made it increasingly difficult to comprehend. I was reading some of the old stuff, like Machiavelli and the art of war…the war tactics in the art of war mention how to deal with swamps…but obviously none of them will teach you how to deal with potentially clever AI's coming out soon. There are just so many goddamn variables added upon life. So many vast and complicated things that there will probably be nothing to guide us that can be taken from the past, at least not much.

There are now international conglomerates who are also not all jew, but who still play with the jew, sometimes collide with the jew, cooperate and even battle the jew. Guilds of trades of sorts of the old times…heh. Their heads would explode if they got a peak of how fortune 500 company operates these days.

Go to whitegenocideproject and listen to the podcast collection titled "Beefcake's Bootcamp". That's all you have to do. Spread it around

I have had some pretty great successes by pointing out something that everyone agrees was an example of the authorities lying to us the people in the past, and then something similar from more recently that would be fresh in their mind, and then asking them:
"So, if you know they were lying to you 40 years ago, and you know they were lying again this past year, why would you believe anything they said in between?
Or anything they said in the future?"

I have used this in the UK specifically regarding the EU and brexit subject as it is well known that in the 1970s, people were told that joining the eu was in no way political, based only on trading more easily, and would not affect our laws.
So the gullible public voted to join which they would never have done had they been told the truth.
Everything the authorities told them turned out to be false, everyone admits that now, but at the time, politicians and media used all the dirty tricks they had to quell any disquiet in the minds of the public about joining the eu.
Then regarding brexit, the media has displayed the most ridiculous bias to the point that it cannot be ignored or explained away as anything other than an organised effort to mislead.
When the normie admits they were deceived by the media and politicians about political issues with huge implications to all our lives at least these two times and 40 years apart, they have to admit that it is irrational to trust ANYTHING they media or politicians have told them in the interim or tell them in the future.
I have seen a fair few normie minds snap at the realisation, and their is a palpable increase in anger as they realise they have been tricked for so long.
Nobody likes to be made a fool of.

If you are a yank, I suppose you could use the JFK cover up and 911 cover up or any othe two widely agreed upon government/ media lies that show long term deception around huge issues that imply anyone trusting the mainstream at this point is either a retard or an intellectual coward.

Try this formula for yourself, it really works:
They lied then yes?
They are lying now yes?
So how can you trust anything they said in between?
Or anything they say in the future?

Doesn't exactly help with the normalfags however. Since it's material they are trained to immediately disregard.

I use the Iraq war to segue into how Israel works against the interests of the American people to serve Israeli interests.

...

A few thoughts and observations by a supremely redpilled individual

- people naturally cherish the truths they discover themselves. none of my friends would have been able to convince me of the things i know now (thanks to this place largely). so maybe a good approach would be just to convincingly show connectivity, but just enough so to trigger curiosity. For instance the wikipedia screenshot showing that the bolsheviks were indeed all jews. or a photo montage of some holohoax bullshit stories. Just enough to have them go 'wait a second, that's kind of interesting…'

->>10988388

please elaborate? how do they operate?

please elaborate? how do they operate?

This.
But the problem with the average normalfag is that the normalfag doesn't WANT to know more. Most of us have something that interests us to the point where we actively spend our own free time researching it. Normalfags don't function like that. I saw this in uni in particular- people browsing news sites during lectures, reading the titles and then discussing those, without even opening and reading the actual article. They require only so much information to make some form of smalltalk. Same with their supposed hobbies and interests.
They really don't care about finding out the truth, especially if the truth is ugly and uncomfortable.

if they will not hear the truth in history then they can be shown it in the present. people can be made aware of jews by showing them things that are happening today or will happen in the near future. if there becomes a movement of traditional (good) living and wholesome natsoc values then jews will combat this and reveal their true colors. it's not just the antisemitism that is an inherent byproduct of natsoc ideology that causes kikes to kvetch. focus on the real foundations of the ideology and then everything else will follow.
if you must talk about the economy then bring up the federal reserve.
i added the feminism essay because it's very good to have under your belt since we're on the topic of talking with the normies.

While redpilling normalfags has always been hard (see ) if we found a way to do it effectively then the future would belong to us instead of the kikes or supposed allies we put our trust and hopes with. Thus the mods will always try and shut down such threads or lines of thinking (see the archive ) as that is against what the purpose of this site is for. Again we still haven't found a concrete method of redpilling lemmings but we have have success with memes and similar bite-sized info dumps, so trying to expand on that with your own experiments might bring great results (especially with all the corrupt goverment, weinstein shit going on). I suggest you work on another website (or even make another one) to use for your last idea of a snopes like information center. As I said before this site is very against such actions and the mods/shills will try to blackpill you at all cost so trying your hand at another site will bring much more success even if its quite harder. I would like to bring up that making a website is quite hard, not in the act of making it but of keeping it running, not only financially but as an urban legend style site you couldn't put too red-pilled stuff all at once, nor but too much x-tier bullshitery, etc. In any case I wish you the best of luck and with the advice to stay of this board (other than the red-pills thread) if you want to continue this idea.

How can you seriously read the Art of War and not get that it's largely symbolic? Know yourself and know your enemy.

We quickly subverted Tay, don't think we can't win against AI.

Pointing out the contradictions in leftist policy is always a winner with me. For example, the acquittal of the illegal in California. You better believe if a white bum shot a black or gay guy he'd be in jail. Guns are bad, but oh, illegals are good, sooo, you can go free!

Who has good documentation of all the anti human elite actions that have happened the last 100 years? I remember daily updates on fucked up shit. Legalized theft, getting away with rape, human rights violations etc. There was constant reminders even on reddit that revolution was the only answer, since cops militaries lawyers ceos psychiatrists businessmen celebrities athletes etc have openly declared that they can do what they want 24/7 and if we even question them we will be punished. I wonder how many whistleblowers / patriots have been killed /tortured/socially assasinated since (((TRUMP))) came around. That might be why nobody is there to alert Norm about why everything is fucked.

I hate to say it but we need some non cia parasite faggots to go full Alex Jones and reignite the outrage that faggot jew cunts like Kucksner and Spenciaer spend 24 hours a day extinguishing. They know they can't beat us in an argument since our system of logic and order trumps greedy evil chaos, so they focus all their efforts on controlled opposition and redirecting rage towards dumb as shit. We are one push away from winning, so we need to just get some mana via anger to banish these kike parasites for good.

I don't think this one will be changing any minds, but it was fun anyway.

The John Oliver hypnosis crew is immune to that. They operate under the assumption that they are always right even when they are wrong. I met this spic who "spent a few summers in Israel" who confidently walked through a white conservative bar mocking the bill of rights, policing swear words, and praising Obama and Bush. This was before obvious controlled opposition candidate in a fake election jew lover (((Trump)) was around and operation brainwash anyone who doesn't worship tv went into effect, so we need some Jedi shit now. I'm currently developing some nuclear social weapons that will let me battle 100 manic zombies given the order from Agent Smith to destroy my will, but taking on even 3 comfortable apathetic zombies without any cool party favors like Iphones drugs or ass kisses is fucking exhausting.

Oh, you will never convert hard leftists You can only pick off more centrists. Part of marketing (what this is) is identifying your target demographic. Then you craft a message for them.

You're making the same mistake that's all too common around here and that's assuming that you know what the normalfag thinks and underestimating their intelligence. Normalfags will react differently to the presented information. Some will take it at face value because they are predisposed to believing certain things and others will reject it. The only time you can safely measure a normalfag's expected perception of things is when you are dealing with them one-on-one and can safely measure their reaction to things if you want to try redpilling them.

Overall my rule of thumb is to never underestimate normalfag's intelligence. We're overexposed to leftists and zionist boomers that we habitually perceive them to be representative of every normalfag without realizing it. When you treat people like they're smart, they will want to continue being treated like they're smart and want to become smart on the issue.

Then add a source to a bite-size redpill. If they reject it even after that they were never intending to honestly give it a chance.

Kek agrees.

In person, I find Socratic questioning a normie on their beliefs is particularly useful. Like with (((Trump))), I asked a normie why he hated Trump so much.


And then the normie starts thinking just a little bit for themselves.

The most brutal Socratic questioning I used was with a beaner bitch:

>White people had guns and (((smallpox))).

B T F O of that Latina bitch.
T
F
O

Where would you classify disbelief. I try redpilling my dad on globalist jews and he just can’t believe that there’s any organized and effective way of totally controlling the whole, very complex world. I tried to say it’s by effective media control, something they have openly admitted to, but I still sense much doubt. I can even get him to agree that giving a nation that attacked on of our navy ships billions of dollars is ridiculous. But people still just think that was some snafu.

What is the mantra? please no bully

OP, your thread is interesting. If you haven't already seen it, you should read this post about the different levels of propaganda.

"anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white" That's the short version, but theres more to it, look into the white rabbit radio if you want to know more.

They need to make the decision for themselves. make them think your injected opinions are their own. Show them videos without making a commentary. If you do make a commentary, they will sense you are imposing your beliefs on them and start to reject what is before them, despite it being true (it's weird, I know, but that's how humans work).

Below is one tactic I present you with. It works. Try it.
Inception: Radically change someone's worldview and make them think it was their own idea

Socratic Questioning is one of the best ways to get someone to re-evaluate their stance on any, and I mean
ANY Topic
Even if it's just for 5 minutes, it places a very visible damper on conditioning

I did this method with Trump's wall, Conversation went like this

Why don't they?

I shit you not he is NSDAP now.

Sometimes thinking things through for someone is all you need, hence why socratic questioning works. People sometimes don't think things through to their logical conclusion and as a result don't have those insights that are all too useful and enlightening. Acting as feedback to someone, assists them in finding things out that they desperately needed to realize.

Normalfags are accustomed to letting someone else thinking for them. But what separates a ZOG news commentator from a person who sits down and helps them sort out their thoughts is that in the end it's their thinking that leads them to the redpill and all we did was help them along the way. This doesn't just apply to normalfags either. Great leaders needed to surround themselves with great advisors. Bouncing ideas off of someone, brainstorming, etc. This is why talking heads and commentary shows are popular with all sorts of people.

One way that can be effective is to present facts that you want the normies to take in in a way that is ostensibly neutral, or even directly counter to the conclusions you want them to reach.

I had an idea about memeing a supposedly pro-Jewish campaign to counter antisemitism. It would be along the lines of "Jewish contributions to society", and highlight the overwhelmingly Jewish origins of the worst degeneracy that has been causing societal decay.

Eg, a photo of Lindsay Amer doing her "Queer Kid's stuff" videos and a caption about how this Jewish woman is pioneering the education of toddlers on sexuality.

Of course, you have to be careful with this. There are those who will take the message at face value and consider it progressive, but people who think this sort of thing is A-OK are past saving, IMO. We need to bring this stuff into the limelight as much as possible so the silent majority see it, and memeing it with positive spin may achieve that.

...

>We can't fix the normalfag. He is what he is, but we can exploit the mechanisms that have been built into him by our (((opponents)))
So much this.

Try a more vertical approach, from a authoritative height. Unquestionable and spoken (shown) with full confidence. As a remark inside a conversation. A lingering piece of small data that upon hearing it just cant add up all lines. Dissonant in the relatable congnition. Use the 'what ifs'.

You make them uncomfortable with the possibilities that it is true. When they start following their normal behavior, you bring back that small bit of contradiction, so they discover it hinders their future enjoyment of life as it were.

Just name small bits of things that contradict themselves between 'what media says' (or consensus) and that new knowledge. Example: fags eat plants because they "can´t feel". But what if plants can communicate with more plants and show signs of suffering?

Normalfags lack critical thinking or they see themselves so smart and invulnerable, and still they end inside cult thinking. With the 'what if' you seed doubts, then present proofs in their daily life. Works best when you manage to forecast events or name the usual culprits.

Also, OP, you have to deprogram each normalfag in private, one by one.
Remember they are inside a forced cult, they can´t show their true thinking in the open because backlash.
Show them there are options.

Work the ownership of media by jews, naming each one in Disney, NBC, etc.

I agree with almost everything else you said, but this is a big mistake.
The strongest ally we have is Truth.
If you start using lies, even little ones, you weaken yourself and your argument.
Should the person you lied to ever find out, how can they trust anything else you tell them?
Become known as the most honest guy around
Be the guy that NEVER tells a lie
It will be noticed.
You will gain strength.
There will be no chinks in your armor.
Make Truth your god, never betray it and it's power will become an invincible weapon in your hands.

Stop being a nigger.


>>>Holla Forums


And here's another shill. Kill yourself.

Oh look, it's TruthAnon.

I don't sign my memes and strip them of all identifying data. I'm user. There's no branding there.

I'd rather follow Alinsky's rules for radicals and not cripple myself by following rules my enemy will not follow.

Apparently sarcasm is totally lost on you if you think I'm leftypol. Learn to meme.

...

Faggot back to Holla Forums

That's why they want this.

Most of us started with something like PUA, where we became redpilled on women and were exposed to topics that were a degree or two away from the social norm, e.g. the nature of women, the biased court system, the decline of marriage, anti-feminism.

From there it's a small step towards more political topics. Because of your anti-feminist thoughts, you're going to be pushed towards conservatism.

Then you found Holla Forums one afternoon when you were sick of /fit/. Most of it sounded like crazy talk, but some threads were funny and the memes were decent.

After a while you become redpilled on other topics, eventually even the Jews.

Think of it like a ladder, with the top rung being the JQ and the bottom rung being PUA or some other entry-level topic that most people can associate with. Without the lower rungs being in place, you can't climb onto the higher rungs. Without those weak redpills, the thought patterns just aren't there to accept stronger redpills.

In a away, The Game by Neil Strauss might have had a massive influence on the current state of politics.

No fucker, and you won't undermine our strength.

...

Generally speaking all memes we generate fall into one of four categories.

Bait memes designed to induce a reaction or convince us to dig deeper into something.
Informative memes which provide information. Postgrabs are a good example.
Language memes which are essentially an addition to whatever language we're using ether via new/repurposed words or images that are in themselves effectively a language at this point and used to better get across the posters ideas/intentions/feelings.
And finally entertainment memes. These memes are just mindless entertainment for the most part. Normalfags love them.

Bonus points if you can tell me what category this image falls under

Pol, birth place of dank ass memes. Pol, has a thread about how to make memes that red pill normies. Op is a fagot. Lurk more queer bait.

It's almost like you didn't read anything Chaim

Reported.

...

We could try making a wikia website? They seem to be able to be made for any topic, but would probably get shut down. Are any of you anons coders? The best method for this would be an easily accessible website in wikia format that isn't overly racist. When you google anything about fascism you have to wade through shill articles then accidentally stumble onto Stormfront, where the first thing you see is someone talking about genocide. We need a normal, easy to read and not to scary website.

how to tell you're a shill faggot in this thread


report to your local RWDS (Rightful War Delegations of Shills) for commendations schlomo you just hit the big times.

Exactly what was it I said that makes me a shill? To redpill normies, you have to use acceptable formats. Normies don't use anything but Wikipedia so we make a website as Wikipedia-like as possible (without public editing)

Agreed with OP. I redpilled my women by focusing on what she paid attention to, and slowly planting logic and reason in and amoungst it all. Allergies, she has horrible hayfever, once I got enough info in about how vaccines cause most allergies, she began to question little tid bits here and there. To the point where once you tug on the big pharma thread, or the financial socio-economic thread the whole tapestry becames a matter of not if but when she is finished unravelling it. Believe me I got my fair share of eye rolls, of uniterested glares, but if you whittle away … Time will help.
Also do not allow there to be a TV present!

Perhaps not exactly like wikipedia. The format would need to be a touch different.
But the general idea is there.

Mostly what I'm thinking is using the recent obsession with fake news and the ever increasing quantities of leaked documents as a vector to influence the normalfags

We should start to reclaim muh emotions from lefties. Pic related. With this type of memes, bad feels can be associated with lefty politics.

Wise user, indeed many companies use bilateral trade agreements and independent settlement systems that bypass the standard financial system entirely, a little-known trick outside of business cycles.
Inquisitive user are advised to look this stuff up to get a bit of hope, not everything depends on the banking jew, shit's a little bit more complicated than "banking jews control everything" (luckily). Many businesses settle their liabilities with each other directly (using this simple trick – jews hate them!), completely outside of the banking cabal. This is not at all illegal.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_credit
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_exchange
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_market_fund
referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Assem-Braz/Bartering.html
also
The NatSoc economic system never truly ended in Germany:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirtschaftswunder
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordoliberalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparkasse
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banking_in_Germany
Goyim bypassing the traditional monolithic banking system and using local banking and barter.. a total holocaust, jews on suicide watch

this is a good one.

The resemblance is uncanny

…unless they're being redpilled, in which case they start demanding proof with notarized certificates of authenticity. I mentioned the Auschwitz swimming pool to my dad and he acted like I'd plopped a jew corpse on the table and started eating. Showing several pics of it made him demand to know how I knew it wasn't just for the guards. I managed to find something that indicated otherwise. He just kept picking at it until I couldn't find anymore proof, and he looked at me like I'd lost my mind rather than providing answers to most of his questions.

Normals are addicted to their bluepills because then the world makes sense in a happy way, instead of making sense in a rage-inducing way.

This.
Truth is on our side. Use it as a weapon.

P.s. thanks for a decent page overlay image for once, mods.

couldn't have said it better

It involved tripping on acid. Are you suggesting I dose people with acid?

Compilations are good.

Compile all the Hollywood pedo'sinto one list or video.

ect like the CNN jews infographic.

This can be said of 99.9999999% of people. No one likes considering things that violate their narratives. Even this board has become a massive hugbox. This shouldn't really matter since what you should do is just poke holes in all the crap someone comes to you with. People like sharing their own views. Just make them question all their shit. Then drop the subtle redpills. This way, you weaken their stance while offering your alternative. They will be forced to choose between something they're unsure of, or (depending how well spoken you are/charismatic) something you're sure of. All without having to piss anyone off. It takes practice and aesthetics go a long way. So get off your ass and do some push ups, looking your way neetcucks.

...

Checked.
This shows promise. Gonna try that out on some normies.

Checked.
Good video and technique.

Checked.
A lot go this route. Little baby steps.

We just wait, and the populus will create an environment that gives us easier access to those that did the "programming" or invading our privacy.
Pretty simple.

I used to be an honest to god Commie, but kept getting into arguments with other Commies about Cultural Marxism, which I didn't support. After countless arguments, and when the original shock value of their shitty memes wore off, I realised that I was part of a group full of retards. Long story short, I just drifted further to the right until I wound up on Holla Forums. At this point I was a , still hating immigrants but for economic reasons rather than social. Pretty much an Authoritarian Centralist. Then I jumped quickly to Fascism.

I've been having a lot of luck in the last year talking to random people at bars.

This has got to be bait.

Study sales techniques to arm yourself with a silver tongue and convince people to whatever.
Learn the yes curve, keep it simple, abc (always be closing), build trust etc.
How to make friends and influence people is a good book. More aggressive books on sales are also a must. I've forgot the names though, anyone got a book recommendation?

Considering the ST origins of this Wojak I say this is a language type meme.

Or entertainment, saved in either case

Well if this is the case you should complete your transformation from faggot to fighter and become a full blown National Socialist.

Only if you are white.

"Hello my goyim
Hello my golem
Hello my shabbos goy

Send me a shekel by wire
Baby my hands on fire

If you refuse me
Goy you loose me
Then you'll not be
Left alone

Oh goyim telephone
And tell me I own you"

t. Jude

perhaps this may be of help https:// judas. watch

I was never a full commie faggot. Socially, I was still conservative, but economically I was left-wing. This is what drove me away from the rest of the commies, I couldn't stand their Cultural Marxism.

I assume he means how they move around half a country's worth in digital currency within seconds to a point at the other side of the globe.

I'm seeing the dubs but this sounds like an idea you've never actually tried.
Actually this video was a lot better than I expected. At first the topic seemed trivial and the news stations unimportant, but
and how Jewish a topic.

Showing someone WOG is very different from your embed, which had humour. This is one of those issues that taps into morality and people who've already decided they're on the goodthink side will be too busy judging you and your motives for showing them something "offensive" to feel that rush of emotions you want.

If you're talking about stereotypes about Jews you practically are mentioning the holocaust. Normies will be too busy judging you as "the kind of person who talks about stereotypes about Jews" to do the self-reflection required. There is no "innocently saying" you noticed a pattern with Jews, especially if you go beyond media control into any negative stereotype. The existence of stereotypes about Jews is the top of the slippery slope to the gas chamber for them, it's a genuine trigger. Don't you remember being one?

You must be forgetting you're talking about racial stereotyping. Categorizing people is bad and looking for patterns in people is more than bad, it's evil. This isn't something you can just overlook, it's a matter of self-concept.

All things in moderation and facts and data can be presented as simply as any anecdote

You've gotta be fucking nuts with this one. He figured that that it was the Jews all along. Tell me you actually did this to another person and it worked out.

(checked)
I have been considering (when trying to redpill normies) using the Age old truth of how History is always written by the victor against them. If history up until now was always subject to the whims and wishes of the victor, the amount of outright manipulation of events often correlating with the level of power said victor had, how can we simply believe all the stories concerning WW2? Does the normie really believe that the Allies were THE great exception to a rule that existed since before the written word?

I think this could leave them with a question that some will want to try to answer, even if it is to quell their own uncertainty. No idea how well this will really work though. But perhaps it will lead a few people down the path to the red pill.

From my experience, the biggest hurdle to overcome has always been: "Look user.. It's not that I don't disagree with you. But this stuff is so depressing, why do you think about it all the time? Go out and have fun, go for drinks." (This is coming from people who actually know that I'm straight edge.) I think the only way to overcome this line of logic that I have encountered, is to turn the entire discussion into a joke. That's why the Alt-Kike had good success with Normies, they spent the entirety of their time mocking SJW's - if you asked the average "MAGApede" why they were against Leftism, it wasn't because they liked Trump or because they hated Hillary. (Although these played huge factors) It was because they viewed SJW's as a sort of clown like character they didn't want to be. We'd temporarily found a way to make politics comedic for Normies. That's where our success has always lied. What do you guys think? Anyone have better ways of beating that "Stop being so negative" bullshit?

good for you if these worked for you, but your opponents were shit if they didn't know these comebacks
You saying he can buy me off for $13,000? this isn't about me this is about my x y z friends who are afraid for their lives.
Also dunno how tax works there but how would you know that figure.

This is the topic of a very famous book and doco series called Guns Germs and Steel. Kids watch it at school and answer set questions on how the Europeans got guns because they stole gunpowder from the Chinese and the Religion of Cuck™ic Golden Age was the highest tech in the world and anyone with that bit of dirt was destined to conquer the world because of geographic luck.

Have you ever heard of a game called "King of the Hill"?

Are you retarded? Despite all the shit usually said about normies they both generally and in this case specifically NOT our enemies. If you want to use lies like the fucking kikes do go ahead but you'll fall into the same traps they did too.

And the solution obvious.

Did you father ever accept the photos and the implications behind them, user?

Literally an anti-white LARP making excuses for why Africa did absolutely nothing. One of his points is that Eurasia is one continuous landmass, therefore they could transmit ideas faster. Pic related proves why that is wrong. Another is that Eurasia is west-to-east, so the climate zones will be the same. Anyone who looks at a biome map can tell you why this is wrong. Not to mention the Congo is the size of West Europe and China, and barely any Eurasian powers actually conquered anything larger than this.

I think the biggest redpill for most people has been how cucked the entertainment industry has gotten. In a lot of ways it seems like (((they))) went too far too soon with the multiculti bullshit shoved into everything.

what the fuck are you doing with that pepe?


what is this (1) even replying to? Are all these people I disagree with shills? Their advice on talking to "the normies" sucks.

This is absolutely useless for talking to anyone who doesn't already agree with you.
That's not math and it's obvious nonsense. Think how many women work in childcare, elder care, and disabled care, and wouldn't have jobs if other women stayed home. How few women work in heavy industries. Of course wages haven't halved.

convincing maybe to conservative women who already have families. Otherwise, circular reasoning that is meaningless to young people and anyone that matters.

This irresponsible memer 4faee8 (4) is the same as the guy insulting
"TruthAnon", 649f63 (2) for saying that making up anecdotes about Jews is a bad idea and destroys trust.

TruthAnon is right

wtf is going on here.

I didn't say it was a GOOD book, I said it was a very famous one that kids at school answer set questions on. You want to be familiar with the set answers if you want to talk to not-dumb beaner bitches about why Aztecs didn't have guns. The point isn't that being part of Eurasia doesn't have advantages over Australia or Africa or whatever, because it did, the point is that 12,000 of agriculture leaves a genetic legacy.

This is my pizzagate elevator pitch.

...

Well most people will always be lemmings going with the current social norms. Critical thinking isn't even taught or encouraged in higher education anymore, it's just indoctrination into the current social conformity. Even the chinks are better critical thinkers than we are now seeing how they see so easily through the modern left social consensus, the so called "baizuo".

I'm running into the same hurdle so curious to see what replies you get

Contra is well known. I remember my (((boss))) getting upset when we brought on a car dealership as a client because he had a secret contra agreement for his car from a competing dealer that his (((friends))) told him to keep quiet. Oops.

Just an observation: 20 or so year ago on usenet, the two big topics I remember were "Feminism destroys kids" and "Alabama Judge" (Roy Moore). Nothing has changed I see.