If Communism is a Jewish conspiracy, how come North Korea has zero Jews? How come North Korea has the most hostile relationship with Israel out of any country on earth, even more hostile than Iran?
If Communism is a conspiracy to make the dominant ethnic group in society a minority, how come North Korea accepts zero refugees and zero immigrants?
China and USSR were quite powerful. They had jews. Communism is a Jewish invention, that is a fact in addition to being a conspiracy (as are all revolutions).
I know it's proven right-wingers have a lower IQ than left-wingers, but this is just bottom of the barrel pathetic. You didn't even bother answering any of my questions - you just re-stated the assumption I criticized in OP without any facts or sources to back up your claim.
lel
anyway, if a korean started eating kosher - not some equivalent of kosher, but straight-up kosher - would it stop being jewish in nature?
no. just like no amount of non-jews becoming christian will make jesus less jewish.
inb4 religion posting takes hold in this shti-tier thread
Its not and nobody ever said it was.
Because then the dictator would lose control over the population as wild dangerous thoughts and knowledge starts spreading. You can't demonize Americans as the devil if 1/10 people meet normal Americans.
If jews are behind capitalism then why were there some capitalist nations not under jewish control?
Such intelligence! Le right wingers can't even compete with my wild skills of intellect *tips fedora. heh i guess its only natural as not many can match me in a game of wits.
North Korea has a centrally planned economy. For-profit business is illegal.
So because Jews, including self-hating Jews like Marx (see pic) were involved in the creation of something, that thing becomes imbued with a metaphysical "Jewishness" that can never be scrubbed off?
Lasers were invented by a Jew. Does that mean lasers are inherently Jewish?
Einstein, a Jew, derived the formula e=mc^2. Does that mean e=mc^2 is inherently Jewish?
I've got a shaft you can suck, faggot.
ELEMAYOH
Because regarding Best Korea commies were right for once it wasn't real communism.
Name a single capitalist country not controlled by Jews.
The only countries not controlled by Jews are Syria and North Korea, and arguably Cuba. I guess it's just a coincidence that these countries just happen to be the last socialist states remaining on earth.
Syria, Iran, Libya.
What the fuck is happening to 8pol? This place has been shit the last few weeks.
Leninism and Stalinism weren't communism real either. Fucking trans commies..
Does it? Got any sources to back that up? I mean, 80-some percent of the world's Jews are in Israel and the US, so that only leaves like 20%, and as there's like 15mil Jews, that's like 3mil Jews for the entirety of the rest of the world.
Because they sold weapons to muzzies.
… Its… not?
Communism is a Jewish-derived societal structure wherein the masses are tricked into deposing their leaders in favor of placing a number of lazy, entitled libshits - who offered them greater personal and societal benefit in the absence of their ethnic elite, which in actuality invariably leads to massive downturn in the quality of life for proles and improvement in the quality of life for the new-elite (the trick) - into power, which they immediately and invariably abuse. It is often, perhaps even usually - and was most famously - put into place via an uprising against the ethnic elite of a nation in a time of turmoil, usually instigated by Jews (or their writings), who attempt to place themselves or their agents in positions of import and influence, brutally crushing any dissent.
As for what you described, you're thinking of something more in the line of globalism, specifically in the context of White genocide.
lel
Yep. For whatever self-hatred he might have espoused - not at all a rare trait amongst atheistic communistic jews, btw - his creation was intrinsically Jewish in trait and espousal. Its not surprise that other atheistic communistic jews were - and are - the ones who find his derivations most appealing, and voice support for it most aggressively.
Nah.
Does a political system being derived from the worldview of an atheistic Jew, and being promoted most-widely by atheistic Jews, and espousing a great deal in common with Judaism, make it inherently Jewish?
Yeah. Pretty much.
leftycucks pissed off spamming the board
Who the said Jews alone have a monopoly on communism?
Almost like chinks are collectivist somewhat out of self interest.
Refer to above, specifically the idea of self interest.
Last few weeks I don't know, but Holla Forums mods got infiltrated and SHUT DOWN so at least a few of these retards are probably tranny communists.
Lots of buttflustered transexual gommunist shilling.
Neofag got wreck't because their admin could not keep his diminutive circumcised peepee out of goyim children and all the cancer contained there flooded to /leftardpol/.
...
...
Jesus Christ bumping it three times.
You are right. Going to kill myself now.
Checked for is cool bro.
...
Syria is the last socialist state in the Middle East. This is the main reason why it's been targeted by imperialism.
The State Department is aggrieved that “ideological reasons” continue to prevent the Assad government from liberalizing Syria’s economy. "Privatization of government enterprises is still not widespread.” The economy “remains highly controlled by the government.”
According to the US Library of Congress: “the government continues to control strategic industries,” “many citizens have access to subsidized public housing and many basic commodities are heavily subsidized,” and “senior regime members” have “hampered” the liberalization of the economy.
According to the Wall Street Journal, “Hafez al-Assad’s son Bashar, who succeeded him in 2000, has failed to deliver on promises to reform Syria’s socialist economy.”
The US State Department berated Syria for having "failed to join an increasingly interconnected global economy".
———–
Iran combines a theocratic government with a largely state-run economy. Some 60 percent of Iran's economy is centrally planned.
en.wikipedia.org
——-
Libya stopped being capitalist when Ghaddafi came to power. Under Ghaddafi, the state controlled most of the economy, and guaranteed all its citizens free education, healthcare, food, and housing.
When Ghaddafi tried to establish an African gold-backed currency to help the continent become financially self-sufficient, the French and other Western trash came in and assassinated him. Now Libya is a capitalist failed state shithole with slave markets and 3 different governments fighting for control of the country.
Holla Forums thinks that Gaddafi is "/ourguy", but in reality he would hate all you pathetic faggots. He gave his life fighting European colonialism and imperialism - something most Holla Forumstards proudly support.
I'm not even in this conversation but who the fuck thinks Gaddafi is "/ourguy/"? Retarded meme, by the way.
Then how come most Eastern Europeans say they lived better under socialism.
Under the Warsaw Pact, there weren't millions of non-whites flooding their countries. There wasn't a culture which promoted degeneracy, selfishness, and drug addiction. There weren't kike banksters swindling the population with "bailouts" and "financial derivatives".
Everybody was able to live a dignified life. We might not have had the material luxuries of the West, but the sense of collective meaning and purpose, the sense of community under Socialism more than made up for the occasional lack of material goods.
Jewish ran idea of civilizing negroes
When not ran for Jewsraeli profit, 100%
communism is the radical negation of capitalism. this board, Holla Forums, is of third positionism.
Capitalism can still exist as an economic activity sum without 100% of a nation wealth and infrastructure being (((privatized))) and as uncle Adie demonstrated you can still have a very active and industrious private sector even under relatively authoritarian socialism.
To fully and adequately explain just how low-energy your kafka trap is; it's going to take so much effort that it would actually trigger the heat death of the entire universe.
What were the ages of those polled? What were the sample sizes? Did they factor for SES? Did they look at it generation by generation?
Communism is a Jewish invention. Communism is Judaism for the gentiles. What's good for the gentiles isn't good for the Jews. Of course the Jews will try to avoid drinking their own poison. This isn't difficult to understand.
third positionism, retard.
>Holla Forums would support (((colonialism)))
Lurk forever.
Just because an anarchist fucked up your shitty board, it doesn't mean you can ruin another board. Also imperialism was a shit meme and the white man's burden was nothing more than altruistic autism.
Now go back to your tranny owned, drama riddled containment board
>>>Holla Forums
How come you're fucking up the catalog with a shit thread? How come you didn't read the sticky and/or redpill threads and or some /pdfs/? How come you haven't killed yourself yet?
To understand Jews, and Communism in the context of Jewry, one must comprehend a single fact: Jews hate Nature.
They hate it. They view it as their enemy. They cannot accept that it rules them, and thus put their belief - and promotion - into other things… Namely deities and, more recently, political ideologies.
In the ancient world, the Jews created a God which they claimed had chosen them, and that its will backed and justified everything they did, no matter how vicious, to other peoples. This worked out well for them, for awhile, then went horribly horribly wrong.
But they didn't abandon this. Because… Fuck Nature.
So they doubled down. Hard. Specifically their religious - and thus political - elite, who made all kinds of crazy shit up, while sitting in the den of wretchedness that was Babylon. Namely, they put themselves in total control.
They gave it another shot… And fucked it up again. A shame Titus didn't finish the job, really. This time, there was no trip to Babylon, there was diaspora.
Kinda hard to keep your faith at that point, but, at this point, it was less a belief in a deity that bound them, so much as the weird societal customs they'd devised. Gradually, in the wake of centuries of change, with no homeland to claim, they simultaneously retained their inwardly focused nature, while demanding an outwardly focused nature on behalf of others - for without such inward focus they could not remain themselves, and without such demand for outward focus they would be constantly driven from place to place… Whiiiich ended up happening anyway, in most cases.
Eventually, their experience and efforts in terms of placing themselves as learned individuals and financiers led them toward more aggressive manipulation of their host nations. During this process, they abandoned a great deal of their religious motive, though continued to espouse an ethnically Jewish culture - and a great deal of this can be seen in the writings of atheistic Jews, for though they may have abandoned the religion, the Darwinian effects of its associated traditions held true through the blood. The result was the creation of a new God - 'equality'. And this the Jews took up as their mantle, ascribing such pursuit of 'social justice' to Jewish culture itself. Just ask the Jews.
tl;dr The Jews create false Gods to present themselves as in service to in order to avoid reverence of Nature.
I'm not entirely sure why.
I've never heard an Eastern European say such a thing. And if I did, I would be very suspicious that I'd found a Jew or a philosemitic pinko.
The same sort of Jews and philosemites who ruled them under socialism are in charge of the EU.
No, there was a whole different sort of culture, that promoted thought-policing, self-deception and faux-social justice/equality.
No, there were a whole different clade of kikes doing the exact same sort of work, albeit in a slightly different context.
Now that's just an outright lie, and you know it.
Funniest part about this is it's actually Nazism which is Judaism for the gentiles.
Jews believe Jews are the master race.
Nazis believe Germanics are the master race.
Jews believe Jews have the right to seize other people's land (Palestinians).
Nazis believe Germans have the right to seize other people's land (Slavs).
Jews believe their race is so superior, it's destined to rule the planet.
Nazis believe Germans are so superior, they're destined to rule the planet.
This should surprise no one who's bothered to research Hitler's Rothschild ancestry.
Communist Alex Jones
Just to choose an example from your image:
>pewglobal.org
Why is that? Could it be that they were being held aloft - at a loss - under a system that didn't function effectively?
Hmmm.
It seems like, in the shift betweeen a corrupt Communist state and a corrupt Capitalist state, they found that Capitalism really ups the ante.
No surprise there.
Here's a fun bit though:
Hmmm. If half the people claim free speech and free religion are important, how can they think they were better off under a system which derived from this:
What's rather amusing to me is, in typical Jewish fashion, and despite these atheistic screeds, Marxist Communism is basically a religion unto itself, worshipping the false God of Equality, which backs and justifies all their ill done deeds.
HE'S BREAKING THE CONDITIONING
At last I truly see. I shall immediately vote Democrat, throw down my guns, grow boobs, open my borders to migrants, and open my other borders to migrants (if you know what I mean.)
No they don't. They believe they're the CHOSEN race.
Big conceptual difference between "I believe my race is the best because a deity said so" and "I believe my race is the best because of Darwinian selection".
And I'm sure you can go to Africa right now and find a ethnic clade that believes they have the right to seize other people's land (other tribes).
False relativism.
Again, the Jews don't believe they're destined to rule because they are superior, per se, so much as because they are CHOSEN. Again, significant conceptual difference between "I think I'm better than you because my God said so" and "I think I'm better than you because Darwinian selection made it so".
Not sure that was ever actually a NatSoc priority. I'd love to see some proofs though.
Also love to see some proofs that Lionel Rothschild was the father of Alois, and that Maria Anna Schicklgruber was a servant at the Rothchild's mansion (which one? Given historians know there were no Jewish families in the city at the time of the pregnancy, this would seem improbable).
Also the problems that I brought up here: , there's no clue about the methodology. Also, I'm now thinking of the problem of rose tinted glasses. Just a quick Google search shows Americans want the 1950s back. Does believe this is evidence that capitalism, segregation and anti-communism cold wars is better now?
Kill yourself, kike. Even low IQ leftypol jews have a basic understanding of Greater Israel and the territories it tries to span across. All interfering and neighboring non-jewish or anti-kike states are a threat.
Will someone kindly post infographics?
OP is shitposting. They haven't put any real thought into what they were going to go with in shitposting here, so they're just throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks.
Fuck's sake, they just tried to claim that the assumption of right to seize your perceived enemies' lands is intrinsically Jewish, right after claiming that if a philosophical perspective could be viewed as intrinsically Jewish due to a Jewish origin, Jewish promotion and similarities to self-interested/self-serving Jewish culture, that this means any and all scientific derivations of Jewish effort must therefore be likewise equivalently Jewish in character. He's got nothing.
Communism is, if not itself Jewish - I believe it is, just lets assume it were not theoretically - shares so much in common with what is promoted on behalf of Jews as "Jewish" in nature, that one would be hard pressed, even if not a single Jew were associated with it's creation (merely those who'd read the writings of Jews), it would be Jewish in character.
Communism is just one more attempt by the Jews to escape the inevitability of Nature's rule, via creation of a false entity or concept which overrides Nature's might and ought be prioritized in behavior and function. At first it was the Volcano Demon, then it was the Rabbis, now it is Equality - always something which attempts to oppose naturalistic "laws"…
To pull from the Hitler quote in the image I posted above:
When people attempt to rebel against the iron logic of Nature, they come into conflict with the very same principles to which they owe their existence as human beings. Their actions against Nature must lead to their own downfall.
That commentary full encapsulates the Jewish worldview and mind, for, as stated previously, if the Jew had or did espouse what the Jew preaches to the gentile to espouse, then the Jew would have ceased to exist more than a millennia ago.
Yet, here he stands, demanding you welcome outsiders with open arms, demanding you embrace equal footing with your lessers, demanding you embrace their ideals which lead to enslavement at their hands. If the Jew genuinely espoused what he preaches, he would not exist.
Going against the iron logic of Nature, the Jew ever finds himself coming into conflict with the very same principles to which he owes his existence as a Jew.
Also, his claim that 'North Korea is not Jewish but communist, thus communism can not be Jewish' is fallacious, ignoring that expectations make the rule. The only damaging line of evidence would be the polls, which are obviously explained by rose tinted glasses or else must take any polls of Americans liking the 1950s better as evidence that capitalism, white separation and nigger lynches are better than America's most closer socialist government today is.
I don't think you'll find anyone on Holla Forums that disagrees with the central premise of this webm. The only difference is that we see the global 'strings' being pulled by the abstract forces of exploitation instead of jews
>proven by (((The Huffington Post))) and other (((sources)))
You may not be a kike but I gotta say you're getting pretty close to being named as an honorary bar of soap. Also:
It wouldn't surprise me if these gommunists were the same faggots flooding up the board catalog with threads based on nigger interracial porn. Also the (((damage control))) on those threads about November 4 happening was really funny.
sage for trash-tier /lowtpol/ """"""""""raid"""""""""".
Exploitation is a spook
Becasue Communism always fails, and then the people turn against the jews, forcing them to flee
...
Private property is a spook, exploitation is not. 'Spooks', or spectres, are social constructs that we believe have power over our ego but in fact do not. Since exploitation is simply the material manifestation of capital, it is not a spook but rather a description of an ongoing process.
Ongoing processes are spooks.
So thats why you're working for a shit salary instead of running your own company?
a) Tell me why I should care about what is and what isn't a spook.
b) And what is the criteria for telling what social construct does and does not affect your ego? Or is this by individual bases?
c) What is the criteria for exploitation? Why is that you are the only one with a monopoly of what is and is not explotation? What happens if someone does not believe capital equates to explotation? Does that grant explotation as being a spook in their mind?
And that is why we laugh at you.
Social constructs are a spook.
Material manifestation is a spook.
Spooks are spooks bro.
You deserve your misery.
The (((mods))) aren't even pretending anymore.They hate this board with a burning passion.
...
Shit thread.
Jews spread communism to China.
Communist China influenced Korea.
Never post here again.
Spooks prevent us from actualizing our full potential by placing unnecessary restrictions on our ego.
Social constructs which are based in the ideal rather than the material affect the ego.
Exploitation is the extraction of a laborer's surplus value to be turned into profit. Exploitation is NOT defined by an individual's beliefs regarding this matter, which is why it is rooted in the material rather than the ideal.
Can someone translate this from autism to human?
Ego= the unique essence that defines our being
Ideal= based in ideas instead of material reality
Material = based in the tangible, material, world
Surplus value = the leftover fruits of a worker's labor after he or she has been compensated
It's funny that I've seen some anons here that say North Korea isn't communist. I guess that could be true but it's not like I want to side with the Norks since that fatass Kim Jong Un kvetches about muh ebil Japanese imperialists just like the chinks and the Worst Korea gooks. My own country was also affacted by the Japanese but you don't really see a lot of us kvetching about the Bataan Death March. Only the politicians that are owned by (((Western powers))) here do. My own mother considered the ones that raped our women to be Korean and not Japanese at all.
The lefts entire base is nogs, spics, muslims, dindus and feminists who major in gender studies. Both sides have an equal amount.
Translation: This stuff is the problem, not that other stuff. Because.
Translation: Only make-believe things can effect make-believe things. Because.
Translation: Quit bogarting my value bro. We're either equals or you're exploiting my surplus.
Translation: That thing that's make-believe and entirely subjective is totally NOT make-believe NOR subjective and that is why it is rooted in reality and objectively defined (when I want it to be). Because.
Fucking wew
NK gives Trump an excuse not to press China on currency manipulation and tariffs while massively increasing the military budget. Its all bullshit.
Translation: eqo = self
Translation: ideal = make-believe
Translation: material = totally not make-believe. Because.
Translation: Seriously quit bogarting my fucking value bro! Equality or I'll fucking neck you m8! Owning shit is for slaves bro!
Isn't that 'soul'?
We should all just let the government ban us from practicing our cultural traditions.
Affect your ego in the Stirner sense by nature of it being a 'spook'.
Marx believed his ideas were rooted in materialism because they followed from rigorous observation and study.
Stirner himself rejected the concept of a 'soul' because it was too specific. In fact, he even rejects the concept of the 'ego', and admits that it is merely an approximation of an individual's essence. This is why in the original German he uses the word "Einzige" which roughly translates to "unique".
And what if a spook does the opposite? Say, the ideal of XYZ ideology causing you to stop ABC, thus acquiring MNO. Does that help the ego? If yes, then you admit that spooks are, on the individual bases at least, helpful. And if they're helpful to the ego, then not following spooks can be detrimental. If you say no, then please show proof that spooks, as in itself, is detrimental.
Are you saying ideal nor social constructions can not affect the ego positively? OK, burden is on you again to show why that is. You're already wrong on ideals since whatever idealogy you're parroting right now is an ideal. Unless you're claiming that your idealogy is of itself a spook and should not be followed for being such.
So I can exploit myself by turning my own surplus value into profit? Am I being exploited if I gift my son my material wealth I labored for which he makes a profit from? If I'm selling my labor to the distributor who then makes his profit from distributing it to the his (not mine) consumer? Am I being exploited or did I sell my labor while the distributor sell his wealth+distribution costs? Also, why is that you have a monopoly on the definition? Why is yours more valid than Webster's or even mine?
But words are a social construction - a spook, if you will. But what my definition strokes my ego? Is it then in my interest to disregard your ideal for my ego? If yes, then I have no reason to regard anything you say as it is a spook which my conflict with my inside view, hurting my ego potentially.
Translation: Yes, only make-believe things can effect make-believe things.
Translation: Jews think strange things sometimes, but they always find a way to justify it. Please don't notice that I dodged acknowledgement of my attempt to portray something which could easily be defined as incredibly subjective, if extant at all in many cases where I might seek to apply it, as objective reality. Because.
Motherfucker. This motherfucker's audacity holy fuck…
THIS is why people don't want to "converse" with you lying subhumans anymore. That also why we all just want to put a bullet in your face.
dude stop you're trying to bring sound economic principles into a discussion about communism
some poor pinko's gonna pop his dome trying to wrap his head around how their own cognitive bias is a spook
Pretty much.
Stirner believed that one can use their ego to replace spooks with constructs more beneficial to one's self. One example he gives of this is replacing 'the state' (a spook) with 'the union of egoists'.
Stirner himself said that any ideology based on his ideas was a spook, which is the reason he wrote that he had "stated his case on nothing." This is why I personally say that I draw inspiration from Stirner rather than "follow his ideology".
Yes, as long as someone else is receiving the profit. This is why Marx spoke about the working class uniting to overcome capitalist ideology. In the end, it is the working class who drive the system forward.
No since this exchange is not governed by the forces of capital.
"Wealth costs" is literally the definition of profit, which means you are being exploited.
I don't, I'm just using the word in a Marxist sense because that's what relevant to the conversation at hand.
Stirner agrees with you on this. This is why he refuses to use a specific word to describe the 'ego' or 'einzige'.
When Stirner used the word 'ego' he did not mean 'self interest' but instead meant the forces which lead to maximum self-actualization. In this case it could be argued that agreeing to my definition will help you to gain more knowledge of my argument and thus help you to self-actualize.
What a good goy you are, 1 extra shekel for you. Remember North Korea is the best Korea and we should all be just like them.
Exactly like them goy
Juche is Nazbol
Korean nationalism is integral to the DPRK
Self-hating Jews always, like their 'non-self-hating' counterparts, negate the issue at hand in an extreme and radical way.
For example, Sam Roth said that "family is an invisible line that doesn't exist" in order to expose Jews who were nepotist to extremes, he took an extreme to the other case.
The thing is, these aren't even necessarily wrong - some things would be more important than family alone; some sons are disowned by fathers… but it is pragmatically disconnected from actual revolution.
The difference with Hitler was that he mobilized familial, tribal, racial animus as something more important than class in order to throw off parasitic bankers and capitalists. However, he also rejected the extreme Communism of self-inflicted unconsciousness that comes from saying 'lines are imaginary' or 'distinction is an illusion' that would make any kind of resistance absurd or stupid. There'd no longer be any means of drawing a line except sheer unconscious bias drawn out by fear - fear which the frightened Jew commie experiences but cannot communicate to non-Jews except as a rejection of everything that makes the non-Jew healthy in body (and mind). the Jew doesn't understand except viscerally that part of having a healthy body and having a sense of aesthetics also involves, inevitably, hierarchy that they would eventually have to compete in.
the destruction of hierarchy as a response to realizing self-destructive nepotism and amoral base greed, is jewish.
Jews are really the ugliest enemies to face, since they lie to your face without conscience and they manipulate your values without shame or guilt. They are not 'strong' except that they are like social and moral equivalents to skunks. They never relent that they are deserving of death for anyone's sake except themselves as Jews. The dissolution of your own tribalism as a response to Jewish tribalism is a false resolution. This is an admission that the impetus is on you to first make yourself vulnerable before the Jew will ever consider it. However, there has been no concessions made by Jews for centuries that were not coerced at first. They like to believe that it is because their culture or religion is more true than others, that they have not ever fully assimilated into a host country to the degree that they forget their Jewish roots.
Their greatest strength is also their greatest weakness. They will always be Jews and will sacrifice anything to maintain themselves as Jews, but if you call them (as a non-Jew) a Jew, they will recoil because they know what being Jewish means to themselves: they will never be of the same kin as you, by their own choosing or even cultural precedent which they are responsible for exclusively. To call them a Jew, knowing that they are a Jew, they think you also know that they will never be anything but antagonistic towards you as their final goal of becoming (((masters))) in the future.
I don't have the patience to look up the sources, but I'll give you my take.
Every communist movement has had jewish advisors and backers, but usually a native as the party figurehead.
Mandela in SA, Mugabe in Rhodesia, Mao in China, etc etc.
All were advised and backed by jews, but to anyone not looking too closely it would appear that it was an organic, native communist revolution.
In NK, Kim Il-sung, an egotist who wanted to do things his own way and become a god, betrayed his jew backers and advisors because he knew he still had support of USSR which at this time had much less jew influence thanks to Stalin.
It is not that hard to believe that while Communism is a system for global central control, despots will arrive in power who choose to keep the basic tenets of the system, but on a national scale, so they have more personal control.
This is what has happened in every instance of communist takeover and does not change the premise that the underlying goal over jewish bolshevism and communism itself is complete global dominance of the goyim.
...
Is the "leader" of the (((film set))) of NK a freemason? Is freemasonry just another branch of the rootless clique? The mafia that has been presenting false dichotomies to make people believe they choose who rules over them for centuries?
Yea, riiiiiight.
Thought it hasn't.
it's true, except anyone at one point a libertarian has the highest IQs of all political groups
afaik most here are ex-libertarian
Read
I see you leftycucks post it all the time but never care to prove any of it to be true at all. It's all hearsay so far. You fucks always have to lie.
You don't know shit about the matter you are trying to conversate on. North Korean "communism" isn't communism but a merge between communism and fascism called "juche".
...
i hear so much batshit crazy stuff form the norkis that i don't know what's what anymore
my theory is that the norkis used communism as though they were kikes themselves and once they got their country on a leash they began reading mein kampf to find ways to keep international kikes from seising their kingdom
basically they act like commies inside their borders and like nazis outside of them
Onkel Wolf agrees -
HEIL HITLER
I don't believe anything I read about north Korea because it's all retarded lampshade tier nonsense. Not like we ever get the Korean side of the story, just what the media tells us they said or did.
Also juche is more along the lines of national bolshevism than internationalist communism.
Hello, what are you sliding?
Juche is radical centrism, or if you don't want buzzwords, it's marxism-leninism mixed with korean ultranationalism.
It's both a religion and a political system which also, includes the largest amount of Human Rights Entitlements, and every nork believes he's the master of his own destiny, but only the Kim Dynasty is the godly entity ensuring that.
We should actually let government sell every cultural product, like traditional foods, clothes and weaves abroad to fuel itself while putting natives who make and enjoy those on watchlists, or beating them to death in basements like Polish-speaking communism government did in post-war times.
NK is a puppet state to influence east asian policy
>en.wikipedia.org
they had Jews indeed
There's a reason you're getting flamed, especially considering that North Korea's government is not a standard government type. Your reference to it as some sort of pivot for the ridiculous idea that gommunism is somehow retroactively magically not Jewish in origin when it obviously is is merely the icing on the retard cake.
There is your answer. LRN2LOGIC.
It really has.
Learn to greentext, nigger.
Jesus was not a Jew. He literally said "I am neither jew nor gentile, I am not of this world." Worth noting that he was persecuted and ultimately killed by jews, as was the prophet muhomo'd the pedo goatfucker. That's why many muslims hate jews so much, because the jews tried to kill their prophet twice. Any messenger of god is always persecuted by them.
...
absolute bollocks
I dont know who told you that but the jew and the arab come hand in hand
muhomo'd the pedo goatfucker would have literally been hanged by the pagan arabs of Medina for banditry because he was attacking the camel trains coming in and out of the desert
they didnt because the jewish Himyarite Kingdom of what would now be Yemen paid muhomo'd the pedo goatfuckers ransom and extended to him personally the protection of their nation for believing in the 'god of moses'
that and jews by and large being exempt from dhimmu status unlike christians and most of the time jews in muslim lands being exempt from the jizhya tax
many jews rose to prominent positions of power in Religion of Cuck™ic lands
the muslims even view circumcision as a way of deepening their covenant with Allah YHWH ringing any bells there lads?
So in other words wether a spook is good or bad you can not empirically say.
I don't think is a sufficient answer to:
I don't think Stirner ever argued that spooks were bad or even 'negative'. 'Unnecessary' would probably be a better descriptor of his views on the subject.
I'm not exactly sure what you mean here by 'affect the ego', but Stirner would have said that by throwing out spooks and replacing them with egoistic constructs, one gets closer to 'maximizing' who they are as people. For example, yes marriage may satisfy some people, but 'true love' is what most of us are really after. By removing the spook of marriage, you are getting closer to true fulfillment.
Marx meant something more specific than that definition. If you redefine "exploitation", then we are discussing different concepts entirely.
This lecture does a pretty good job of explaining Stirner's ideas if you're interested in learning more
vimeo.com
Because that's how the Jews like it. They want workers, and it doesn't matter to them whether the worker concerned is an eastkike or nigger or shitskin, just as long as he's not white enough to think any differently. What fucks do they give if Korea wants to keep Jews out? They've already got into the country's ideology.