Cultural marxism

What is it? Marxism is the economic analysis and critique of capitalism, so what is cultural marxism?
Redpill me

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blank_Slate
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjernevask
archive.is/OYFM6
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Kill yourself you stupid faggot

>>>/polarchive/

...

...

Whatever OP you're a fag. That's an awful Jewish looking dude in your picture, you should start there.

That's a Jew.

That's alot of clean water in a warzone.

LURK MOAR FAGGOT

Isn't that true, though?

...

Thank you all for the thoughtprovoking answers. I am now a nazi.

you can't ignore human nature, let alone base an ideology or society ignoring it

Marxism is NOT an economic analysis and critique of capitalism…
>Capitalist (((Bankers))) financed Communism

Marxism is a strategy for fomenting revolution by pitting one class against another. ie; Bourgeoisie VS Proletariat

It is pitting CULTURES against one another
Feminists VS MGTOW
Black VS White
China VS India
Straight VS Gay
Religious VS Atheist

By splitting everyone into camps, you can gain power without anyone noticing…

Its divide and conquer…

The genetic relationship between many personality traits and behaviors is well known.

Behavior differences between males and females can be observed in new born babies.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blank_Slate

humanbiologicaldiversity.com/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjernevask

Why not join a NatSoc group and learn all about it? It wouldn't be your nose or skin colour preventing you from doing so, would it OP?

It was the CIA you tools.

It'd likely be the number of plants and cointel pro.
Personally, I'd give said groups leeway. Especially since they like to try and recruit people, then use them against the natsoc group itself. And those who don't? They become domestic terrorists.
See: Ruby Ridge.
My advice to OP is to tread carefully.

take the communist manifesto, replace prole with oppressed and bourgeoisie with oppressor, and apply the dynamic wholesale to just about anything (intersectionality).
Feminism is women are proles, men are bourgeoisie.
Queerism is cisnormies are bourgeoisie, LGBTQ are proles.
Third Worldism is Euros are bourgeoisie, PoCs are proles.
As you can see this is a very exploitable template for fanfiction and identity politics, even the alt-right has to use the master's tools to dismantle the master's home.
archive.is/OYFM6

tl;dr
Cultural marxism is the application of marxist ideology to sociology.
As an example: while marxism holds that individual differences in ability cannot account for differences in social class/wealth, cultural marxism holds that differences between ethnicities cannot account for differences in culture.

Then you've got the stinking turd of cultural relativism adding a whole nother layer of horribly idiotic dogma in which opposing views which are shared in equal measure within their respective cultures hold equal value.

what are you sliding, jew?

Marxists believe that dialectical materialism was a science of understanding history, so they thought that the socialist revolution which would bring world communism was as inevitable as a rock falling under gravities force. Dialectical Materialism was as much a scientific approach to history as it was a philosophical system.
Why didn't the proles overthrow the bourgeoise like the theory predicted tho? Pre WW2 a nationalist wave took over Europe (precisely the opposite of an international workers revolution) which was a mortal blow to the Marxists predictions.
Cultural Marxism grew out of this challenge to Classic Marxism and they placed blame for the failure of the proles to revolt squarely on cultural forces. The culture of oppressive western society was the problem, and should be deconstructed until a revolution is ready and a new vanguard could form and bring about world communism. The new vanguard are groups mentioned in this thread- BLM activists, feminists, trans and queer activists, etc.
The transition to cultural Marxism (and post modernist power theories) was very appealing to the radical left in the 30s through 70s because the failure of the Soviet command economies (socialist economics) helped repudiate the claim of economic superiority that left wing academics and journals believed.

Think "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" but applied to social status. Disadvantage is turned into a virtue, advantage is something to be ashamed of. Now everyone is """(((equal)))""".